Sheik djibouti
Well-known member
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 6,399
I would counter that Kane was supposed to fill that role...and hence why we paid a six figure sum to keep him here beyond January....We’ve been extremely unlucky with injuries to key players this season, that’s for sure. However, the whole point of having a squad is to ensure that you have adequate cover where it’s likely to be needed. Not getting cover for Gorrin was foolish. Similarly, not getting sufficient cover for the back four and for the duo up front was foolish. What we are seeing now is the revenge of reality.
Although something tells me that our owners might just be breathing a short term sigh of relief. We might still get into the playoffs I guess and we might still get promoted, although I wouldn’t put any money on it. I’m starting to think that would present a dilemma for Bakrie et al as things stand. They’d be compelled I reckon to invest a substantial amount into the first team if that happened this year. It seems clear to me that the overt ownership issue will only be resolved when/if they get the go ahead for Stratford Brake. I wonder if they’d be happier for us to remain in league one until that’s resolved one way or another.
That said, whilst both are deep sitting central midfielders, they are very different beasts with Kane much more of a quarterback, while Gorrin was more a defence protector/mopper-upperor (officially recognised FIFA position) type role...BUT the Kane role (as I will keep on saying) works so much better with Brannagan in there as he does some of what Gorrin did defnsively, plus providing an outlet AND adding goals (which is why he is so sought after!!)