OX14
Well-known member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 8,376
Browne. Gorrin is out for the season as well so that’s 5.
Gorrin has been injured for months, Karl decided not to get a replacement in January for him.
Browne. Gorrin is out for the season as well so that’s 5.
Think we need to scrap this back 5 now Moore is back, its making us less productive going forwards.
Gorrin has been injured for months, Karl decided not to get a replacement in January for him.
Do you think he played well? Do you think he improved the team when he came on?
Literally not one person that I’ve seen has ‘blamed’ the defeat on him. Show me the post that says ‘Sam Winnall is the reason we lost to Plymouth’??
Still injured though isn’t he? We lost £3 million pounds last year, have a squad size limit on top of that so there will always be some concessions in squad building. No team at this level would not be weaker for having players of Browne, Baldock, Brannigan, Moore and Gorrin out.
Take it from someone who was at the game, Winnall was just no good. He brought nothing to the game. It's a shame but he just isn't the player that he may once have been.I didn't see the game, but I did see Winnall hassle the Ipswich defence in the last 10 minutes and contributed to us getting the corner that we scored from.
No one is saying that Sam Winnall is anywhere near the level we want or need. But it's a little embarrassing to rush to this thread within seconds of a defeat to criticise a 67th minute substitute.
From someone at the game, how did Matty play? Barely heard his name mentioned on the radio.Take it from someone who was at the game, Winnall was just no good. He brought nothing to the game. It's a shame but he just isn't the player that he may once have been.
Hardly touched the ball.From someone at the game, how did Matty play? Barely heard his name mentioned on the radio.
and then it was with his handHardly touched the ball.
Not very well. Winnallesque in his movement.From someone at the game, how did Matty play? Barely heard his name mentioned on the radio.
He's this season's Jamie Mackie. Legs completely gone. But he doesn't wave his arms around as much as Mackie, and isn't quite as embarrassing. But it's a close call.Take it from someone who was at the game, Winnall was just no good. He brought nothing to the game. It's a shame but he just isn't the player that he may once have been.
Baldocks injury is what will ultimately cost us the playoffs. Him and Taylor were phenomenal and without doubt would have got at least a goal today. Taylor looks half the player since.and then it was with his hand
Embarrassing?I didn't see the game, but I did see Winnall hassle the Ipswich defence in the last 10 minutes and contributed to us getting the corner that we scored from.
No one is saying that Sam Winnall is anywhere near the level we want or need. But it's a little embarrassing to rush to this thread within seconds of a defeat to criticise a 67th minute substitute.
Baldocks injury is what will ultimately cost us the playoffs. Him and Taylor were phenomenal and without doubt would have got at least a goal today. Taylor looks half the player since.
I think the point is every game we played in the new formation with Baldock and Taylor up front together, we looked very dangerous. Every game without Baldock we’ve not looked quite as good with two up top.I don’t get this at all. Yes Baldock is a big miss, but we only signed him in January (possibly February)!! What about the 3/4 months prior to his arrival?? We looked a lot more threatening going forward with the 4-3-3 in my opinion. Seems like KR is the one to blame, not the loss of Baldock
This, for me, sums up how poor Winnall is. I think you recently said how valuable his goal against Sheffield Wednesday, if you're picking out a goal scored 10 games ago or briefly hassling a defender then you're scraping the barrel. It reminds me of people standing by Hoban for months based on chesting a pass to Roofe who stuck a 25 yard volley in the top corner, or Obika laying a ball off on the halfway line a few passes before we scored away at some no hopers. If you're having to go back weeks or months for a bit of play that's contributed something positive then it's a pretty strong hint that that player isn't up to it.I didn't see the game, but I did see Winnall hassle the Ipswich defence in the last 10 minutes and contributed to us getting the corner that we scored from.
No one is saying that Sam Winnall is anywhere near the level we want or need. But it's a little embarrassing to rush to this thread within seconds of a defeat to criticise a 67th minute substitute.
This, for me, sums up how poor Winnall is. I think you recently said how valuable his goal against Sheffield Wednesday, if you're picking out a goal scored 10 games ago or briefly hassling a defender then you're scraping the barrel. It reminds me of people standing by Hoban for months based on chesting a pass to Roofe who stuck a 25 yard volley in the top corner, or Obika laying a ball off on the halfway line a few passes before we scored away at some no hopers. If you're having to go back weeks or months for a bit of play that's contributed something positive then it's a pretty strong hint that that player isn't up to it.
I think the point is every game we played in the new formation with Baldock and Taylor up front together, we looked very dangerous. Every game without Baldock we’ve not looked quite as good with two up top.