Whilst certain parties might be overstating the case, I think you were probably understating and dismissing it too readily:
www.bbc.co.uk
Whilst certain parties might be overstating the case, I think you were probably understating and dismissing it too readily:
Instagram admits moderation mistake over racist comments
The social-media platform said its technology had been erroneously identifying the comments as benign.
It seems that the implication of great many 'monkey' posts was simply not picked up, add to that Twitter, Facebook, the defacing of a mural, etc and it's quite a bit higher than 5 people, which is something you'd already guessed to be honest.
apnews.com
Either way, a few more than 5 you quickly latched on to earlier in the thread. But yes, we are in agreement - whatever the actual number it was too many.I don`t pretend to understand how the AI works or how such things are counted. Do they only count original posts? Shares/reTweets/Tags I have no idea.
However, be it 5 or 500 people there are 67 MILLION people sat on this rock so it is a generally insignificant amount in the grander scheme of things.
It could have been the number of accounts that Tw*tter suspended.
Police investigate racist abuse of three England players
British police have opened investigations into the racist abuse of three Black players who failed to score penalties in England’s shootout loss to Italy in the European Championship final.
Facebook, which owns Instagram, said Monday it tried to remove harmful content as quickly as possible and encouraged people to use the tools it offers to block abuse.
“We quickly removed comments and accounts directing abuse at England’s footballers last night and we’ll continue to take action against those that break our rules,” it said in a statement.
Twitter said the “abhorrent racist abuse” has no place on its platform, adding it removed more than 1,000 tweets and permanently suspended a number of accounts for violating its rules.
“We will continue to take action,” Twitter said, “when we identify any tweets or accounts that violate our policies.”
Either way it is too many and way past time something was done to limit how folk use anti-social media.
Still wrong[emoji6]
Russia then......
There seems to be a desire among some to prove that division in society exists on the basis of class or cultural background rather than race. 'Proof' of this hypothesis is offered in the form of snippets found on social media, no doubt after hours of searching.
Well clearly there are divisions on the basis of class or cultural background - but that doesn't mean that all richer or more middle class people are woke ponces, or all working class people are racist cos they can't be expected to know no better. Anyway, the 'working class' (however defined) is substantially made up of non-white people.
Well now I don't know what to think! Searching Google right now to find my opinion ....
I agree with this - Rashford had a plan and a method to score, he waited for keeper to go he just didn’t execute the strike by a cm. (looks bad when he hits post - that goes in and everyone raves about how cool under pressure)
Would the goal have been six inches to the left then? If you are on the wind up (and Welsh plus Rugby on an English football club forum suggests it's a good chance) then you need to up your game
Donnarumma in effect saved Rashford's penalty, Rashford would have put that in the net against almost every other keeper on the planet
as i've said before, i say it as i see it 99% of the time, granted i do get emotional at times and say things i don't mean. but Lloris is a better keeper than Pickford, or Pitchfork as Favour calls him. Shilton was overrated, if Southall had been in the England goal in Italia 90, England would have won the WC.
