Who should he be asked by?Hang on. Nobody is hating on Southgate. He’s a good bloke. One who’s got very close to winning the thing. But there’s been faults. People need to be alive to that too.
He needs to be asked about his selections. Not just the 5 lads who took a pen.
He needs to be asked about his selections.
He needs to be asked about Jack Grealish and the ways he was underused.
He needs to be asked about his tactics, the way he set up. Was it deliberate to sit back and invite Italy on?
How about the subs for pens?
Saka above DCL, DCL who is. Pen taker for Everton and for Jordan Henderson grabbing the ball from him on the warm his, may well have scored…
……………The concept/movement/statement/tagline, whatever you want to call it, of Black Lives Matter in modern times, existed a long time before the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation was set up by three activists in 2013.
By taking the BLM slogan and using it as the headline for their activist organisation, claiming the domain name blacklivesmatter and basically calling themselves Black Lives Matter the majority of the time, they haven't half clouded the waters between their own movement and general support for equality that was always using the Black Lives Matter slogan. Indeed, the organisation is linked to Marxism due to a number of statements made over time, particularly in the last 2-3 years.
It is clear that by having the BLM slogan attached to the show of unity and longing for equality, that taking the knee brings, it has lost the support of a large number of people in this country. But to me, it is clear that sportspeople aren't taking the knee to support the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation and if people can't see that, it utterly astounds me. There is now a political party called "Reform", but if people use the term, it doesn't mean they are supporting that parties views or politics.
Taking the knee is not new, it wasn't created by the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, by doing it, you're not supporting them or their ideas. You are supporting the concept of equality that has been strived for by people of all genders/colours/races etc all over the world for hundreds of years.
did you watch any of it?Class war?
Blimey, Marx is alive and well after all.
what a surprise.I stopped when he said the majority of people booed - not at the two games I attended they didn’t. I’m suprised I got that far after the unedifying sight of the presenter climbing up Liddle’s a**e. This is the man who called Southgate ‘toxic, divisive and ludicrous‘, oh and ‘thick’ for good measure. He’s a drunk with dubious opinions looking for views and clicks. Just keep repeating the words ‘woke’ and ‘virtue signalling’ and he has the likes of you slobbering and clapping.
‘
did you watch any of it?
first 15 is about the football then it moves on a bit.Only the first 5 minutes so far.
Reference to 'being woke' is a handy way for some to pour scorn on the values of decent people. As recent posts on this thread prove, via Google and other search engines you can find articles that support any view you care to mention. Many of those who are branded 'woke' will also have been branded 'snowflake' in other contexts. Pigeonholing indeed.What's does being woke entail? Seems like another word that means different things to different people and is used to try and pigeon hole people.
Purely on dictionary definition it is generally accepted to mean being awake or attentive to sensitive social issues (such as race). So "being aware of", effectively.Reference to 'being woke' is a handy way for some to pour scorn on the values of decent people. As recent posts on this thread prove, via Google and other search engines you can find articles that support any view you care to mention. Many of those who are branded 'woke' will also have been branded 'snowflake' in other contexts. Pigeonholing indeed.