Not sure that was as bad a game as some are making out. I thought the first half, we got stuck into matching Wycombe physically but lost sight of our own game. A couple of excellent saves from Stevens kept us in the game but it was still very even.
I thought the second half we came out with more belief and played some nice football at times. Forde and Sykes looked very good on the right, and Henry linked well with both. Gorrin and Brannagan were both fantastic in the middle, and bullied Wycombe back. Neither gave an inch and it put Wycombe on the back foot. Taylor, I thought looked much better. He was coming deep to try to influence games, ran the line well and hassled their back four, and was unlucky not to get on the end of a number of decent balls into the box.
Gavin Whyte looked poor. I know that sometimes we see things differently depending on where we sit, but with the exception of one run in the first half I cam barely remember him doing anything of note. I know he is on his less preferred side, but I would have expected him to have found a way to have a greater influence. Others might have seen it differently, but he was the weak link for me from an attacking perspective.
Our defence was much more solid, and dealt with most things that Wycombe had to offer. A couple of nervy moments but certainly much better than last week.
Also, I'm sure there will be comments about the lateness of the subs. However, we were in control late into the game and looking more likely to score. I think making the subs much earlier could have killed our rhythm and other than switching Whyte I'm not sure they would have made much difference.
Certainly more to be happy about than to be worried about.