Mystery Yellow
Active member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2018
- Messages
- 799
Dickie?
Dickie should be given a go but the 3 who I’ve mentioned aren’t good enough to play aside him which makes it more annoying that Raglan was allowed to leave on loan
Dickie?
Quite right. And he pockets the lot.I don’t care what anyone’s opinion of eales has been over the last 3 years. One thing that can’t be argued is he’s f*****g brilliant at getting the best possible deal out of transfers. Even above what the players are worth
Just get Malc a couple of Dutch beers Amstel will do.
Not strictly true Dave. His holding companies show profit and loss and he gets paid from them. The need for him to actually put money/cash into OUFC is not there. All on paper. One of the wondrous things about being a director (with vast experience of capital funding etc!)Like he also pockets the £1m+ loss every season you mean
So Oufc doesn’t run at over £1m loss per season ? With £11m plus debts ? The myth that Darryl keeps the lot is wrong, even charlie is in agreement that his balance sheet now is probably fairly even in what he’s put into Oufc and could have taken out. And that’s not accounting for operating costs, agent fees and stuff like that. Purely transfer income vs cost of club and estimated transfer fees spent. (Which he airs on the low side)
No, what I am saying is that Eales does not keep putting money in. So, he is not running a £1m loss. Part of the running costs of the holding company, Ensco1070, for OUFC that is in turn, a holding company for Alcydion, is a salary to the director. So Eales is actually making a living out of OUFC, nothing wrong with that but, he is not having to dig into his pocket every month to fund the club.So Oufc doesn’t run at over £1m loss per season ? With £11m plus debts ? The myth that Darryl keeps the lot is wrong, even charlie is in agreement that his balance sheet now is probably fairly even in what he’s put into Oufc and could have taken out. And that’s not accounting for operating costs, agent fees and stuff like that. Purely transfer income vs cost of club and estimated transfer fees spent. (Which he airs on the low side)
Well he’s recouped that with the transfer deals over the last 2 seasonsLike he also pockets the £1m+ loss every season you mean
So Oufc doesn’t run at over £1m loss per season ? With £11m plus debts ? The myth that Darryl keeps the lot is wrong, even charlie is in agreement that his balance sheet now is probably fairly even in what he’s put into Oufc and could have taken out. And that’s not accounting for operating costs, agent fees and stuff like that. Purely transfer income vs cost of club and estimated transfer fees spent. (Which he airs on the low side)
Maybe we should just keep this on topic?
Well he’s recouped that with the transfer deals over the last 2 seasons
Doesn’t sound a lot
Jheeeeze 350k is pitiful.
I get keepers go for less but that would hideous.
Championship clubs receiving bids from Premier League teams:
"I geniunely believe this lad is worth the full £12 million"
Championship clubs bidding on League One players:
"You'll get a packet of crisps and be grateful for them."
Championship clubs receiving bids from Premier League teams:
"I geniunely believe this lad is worth the full £12 million"
Championship clubs bidding on League One players:
"You'll get a packet of crisps and be grateful for them."