Oxymoron
Well-known member
- Joined
- 7 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 2,829
If that were indeed the case, then why wouldn’t they communicate in advance to the Ultras the change of policy.
If precedent has been different and you change it then show some respect to your stakeholders rather than what we can safely assume was a last minute and rather smug rejection of access.
had a message through.... Im told that those behind flag-gate 2 are being exposed currently on twitter (i dont have a twitter account btw, so Im just passing on the message)
go to ... @junior02334 for the inside info
of twitter exchanges? .... can anyone share em on here?Yup, junior with some screenshots
im a non twit tooJunior has a protected account so not visible to non-Twits
each and every single one would need to be fire certificate approved by oufcs head of safety , Mr Ian 'killjoy' MixterDon’t mean to be funny (exile who rarely gets to games), but if everyone brought a flag or banner along no matter how old, then the ultras might not have felt like they were pushing s**t uphill to make an atmosphere.
Don’t mean to be funny (exile who rarely gets to games), but if everyone brought a flag or banner along no matter how old, then the ultras might not have felt like they were pushing s**t uphill to make an atmosphere.
look at how the ultras are treated and then take a long think about what YOUR head of safety/security is doing in your name Tiger... who is paying Ian Mixter's matchday fees , is it oufc, or is it stadco? the latter seems the more likely to meLast bit of tigers notes ?
fair play to em tooLads making their feelings known...