Royalstandard74
Active member
- Joined
- 1 Jul 2021
- Messages
- 687
I thought we released him with future interest? Or am I thinking of a different player we released?No, because we released him.
I thought we released him with future interest? Or am I thinking of a different player we released?No, because we released him.
So we are 13 years into our current academy structure which over that period must have cost a substantial sum to run but frankly with little financial or playing return.
How do you calculate the income from player sales (of academy graduates) in the past year as £400k?
Which other academy graduates would you say could be regarded as established members of the first team squad currently.
Finally, at what point in the future do you see 5 or 6 academy graduates as established first team squad members. I doubt that is likely in the the next 10 years if at all.
Isn’t the truth of the matter that for clubs like ours, the cost of running an academy is uneconomical as with a very few exceptions the ability to attract potential is non existent.
I thought we released him with future interest? Or am I thinking of a different player we released?
Excellent point. I think it really is a case of these three showing us a reason to keep them for the rest of this season, as we absolutely cannot keep all three. I'd only want us keeping one of those three due to too much time on the sidelines.But let’s say it as it is, carrying Murphy, Edwards and Browne in to next season whatever league we’re in is absolutely not an option.
I wonder how much our academy/youth setup would need to make from compensation and sales over say a 5 year period for it to be profitable. If we made £400k from it last year, that's around £33,000 a month. You'd imagine it costs a lot more than that to run.- Clubs receive funding for academies from the premier league, but it does take time to build, has a correlation with performance of the first team (when it comes to recruitment) and does involve financial commitment from the club also. To date I would guess it has been broadly cost neutral with player sales. What you can see year on year is a progression of the number and quality of talented players in the system. It is not a guarantee but Exeter City have made £10-£15 million with the sale of two academy players so there is also an aspect around investment risk/reward.
- Players sold in younger age groups to premier league clubs with defined EPPP compensation
- Currently only the ones who are obviously.
- I think I said season 25/26 but that may also depend on what division we are in.
- No
Being transfer listed i would think so depends on the fee im sure they want over 250k im sure it would be a similar fee for goodwin also if not moreHave we gone back in for Marriott
Is it perhaps Jack Stevens you're thinking of?I thought we released him with future interest? Or am I thinking of a different player we released?
You can't release anyone with future interest as releasing them, makes them a free agent with no contractual link to you, and no transfer negotiations between clubs.I thought we released him with future interest? Or am I thinking of a different player we released?
I think we will get him for less than 250k for some reason probably being wages wants him of there books but previously we offered more so it would be there lossBeing transfer listed i would think so depends on the fee im sure they want over 250k im sure it would be a similar fee for goodwin also if not more
Agree.- Clubs receive funding for academies from the premier league, but it does take time to build, has a correlation with performance of the first team (when it comes to recruitment) and does involve financial commitment from the club also. To date I would guess it has been broadly cost neutral with player sales. What you can see year on year is a progression of the number and quality of talented players in the system. It is not a guarantee but Exeter City have made £10-£15 million with the sale of two academy players so there is also an aspect around investment risk/reward.
- Players sold in younger age groups to premier league clubs with defined EPPP compensation
- Currently only the ones who are obviously.
- I think I said season 25/26 but that may also depend on what division we are in.
- No
Anyone with even a smidgen of football knowledge could see it was non-football related with Jones. To not even have him on the bench, come on!We missed out big time with Jones. Imagine it will be a fairly substantial fee if it happens. Still got a year and a half left on his contract at Notts.
Surely the opposite? And will be until we actually land one of these fabled targets.Seem pretty confident Charlton end that they will end up signing Goodwin. That may well be the case, the interesting point for me is that we still seem to be flying under the radar as to how deep our pockets are and the wealth of our owners
I think we will get him - not that far to Relocate and surely looking at the table and agents will know oxford are wanting a Striker would like to think we get it done time for our board to dig into their pocketsSurely the opposite? And will be until we actually land one of these fabled targets.
Surely the opposite? And will be until we actually land one of these fabled targets.
Excellent point. I think it really is a case of these three showing us a reason to keep them for the rest of this season, as we absolutely cannot keep all three. I'd only want us keeping one of those three due to too much time on the sidelines.
Dropping Browne, Murphy and Henry at the end of the season will also do our wage bill the world of good.
Henry is done. If Browne and/or Murphy are still here next season then it'd have to be on significantly reduced wages for it to be worth our while.
Better still would be for us to spend that money on up and coming players who can offer you the minutes and a resale value, rather than continuously hoping for a miracle of science to restore Browne and Murphy to their peak.
The club are obviously looking at Edwards with a view to next season, I can't help but think (and hope) that means Ed and Des have already made a decision on Browne and Murphy. Surely they are both clever enough to know you can't have all 3 in a squad (at least on current wages) and 'hope for the best'.
Ah, could be, I remember we had that option on a player but couldn't remember who.Is it perhaps Jack Stevens you're thinking of?