When you say no-one can prevent it - it obviously can be dealt with - they lost 9 games this season and failed to win another 14.
So, to that end, I thought I'd check who they appeared to struggle against to try and gauge if there is an approach that works against their style.
- They failed to beat 7 teams over 2 games across the season - Ipswich, MK Dons, Sunderland, Pompey, Rotherham, Wigan, Wimbledon.
- So, a mix of playing styles perhaps, but with the exception of Wimbledon all clearly top half sides and 4 of the 7 are sides that finished above them (they only won 1 of the 10 games against the top 5 - Sheffield Wednesday at home a couple of weeks ago).
- Interestingly, the 2 sides that did the double over them were Ipswich and MK - the 2 sides with the highest possession based game by far - which suggests that this is the way to play against them (although last night may suggest otherwise). Even Wimbledon are far more of a possession based side than their League position might suggest.
- Perhaps one thing that Ipswich and MK have in common vs us is that they both have strong defences (4th and 3rd fewest goals conceded respectively) and solid GKs (Walton at Ipswich had great stats for the season, the 2x MK Keepers pretty average but still solid).
It appears to be that the best way to combat what Wycombe do so effectively is to actually play football and keep possession (as we do) - BUT you must also be able to deal with the few chances that they do create and keep alert to the danger. Perhaps we did this better in September than we did in January.