Wasn't Jamie Brooks from the youth team?We were offered / encouraged to buy Charlie Austin but chose Jamie Brooks instead in the conf days !
Wasn't Jamie Brooks from the youth team?We were offered / encouraged to buy Charlie Austin but chose Jamie Brooks instead in the conf days !
Do you mean jamie cook because Jamie brooks was a youth team player long before the conference daysWe were offered / encouraged to buy Charlie Austin but chose Jamie Brooks instead in the conf days !
Jamie Cook, surely...as the people above have also said.We were offered / encouraged to buy Charlie Austin but chose Jamie Brooks instead in the conf days !
Yes , christ I am fuddledDo you mean jamie cook because Jamie brooks was a youth team player long before the conference days
Yes I remember seeing both of them !Do you mean jamie cook because Jamie brooks was a youth team player long before the conference days
Yes as said I meant Cook !!Wasn't Jamie Brooks from the youth team?
We were offered / encouraged to buy Charlie Austin but chose JamieBrooksCook instead in the conf days !
Yes and what a second debut goal for Jamie Cook !At the time, Jamie Cook appeared to be the ideal signing. He'd scored 13 and 15 goals in the previous 2 seasons for Crawley and had just scored 3 in 5. Also, we were looking for someone who was prepared to play as a wide left forward with Beano/Midson in the middle and Green on the right.
Ho-hum.
Get out. We'll have none of that heresy on these pages. Cover of wide defensive positions is talk of the devil.Tomlinson looks an interesting prospect, can cover RB as well apparently. I know this is a crazy idea, but maybe we could sign Tomlinson and Cochrane on loan for the season so we actually have two LB’s...
The BBC Oxford Twitter account rarely posts rumours in this way until there's concrete evidence, and the Ox Mail are normally the first to jump on rumours/steal from here and have said nothing, so I think you could be right there. KR/OUFC gives them at RadOx the story that we're ready to move on but the doors open then it puts the pressure on Ruffs to make a decision.Strange that two targets would be named in this way. I suspect that this is as much about applying pressure on Ruffels than anything else.
Having said that, these players look exactly like the kind of players we should be targeting. Tomlinson especially.
Cochrane looks the more promising of the two, judging by the limited amount of videos that I have seen. Younger, more chance to develop and sell on for a profit. Get it done!
Tomlinson - 20, scored 11 in 40 this season! Ex Brighton youth, was his first season in National League.
JMA released Shandon and we offered him a scholarship. But don’t let that stand in the way of trying to claim the glory.