ChamonixOx
Well-known member
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2018
- Messages
- 1,015
So if we don't get promoted next season, we'll be playing Leeds once again in 24/25. If so, let's hope they get some decent scaffolding this time for the camera crew!
Can someone remind me of the reason Allardyce was sacked as England manager? Asking for a friend (no connection, of course, to the above post).It’s crazy isn’t it?!?
Only in football, can you be a useless, negligent failure, and a despicable, disloyal piece of s**t, and then land a cushy job at the top table, no doubt on big bucks!
He must’ve been doing a huge amount of manipulative schmoozing and a**e kissing to land that job.
I bet the arrogant prick is well proud of himself, sat there thinking his s**t don’t stink.
I wish him nothing but failure. The c**t.
After Karl is done with Leeds he should try a career in politics. He'd be a shoe-in for a Cabinet role.
What exactly is Sam Allardyce accused of?
England manager was recorded giving advice about third-party ownership of players, which was banned worldwide last yearwww.theguardian.com
Well, as far as accents go he is going 'trans pennine' so he may have to start using Yorkshire lingo!!This is a perfect chance for him, I bet he can’t believe his luck. Knowing the way he and his agent work, he will be pulling out all the stops to secure the job. Bet he’s not so interested in learning another language now.
Blimey I never realised how alike they look. Is Allardyce KR's dad?What a schmoozer..
You’ll get this bloody thread locked again if you carry on.Blimey I never realised how alike they look. Is Allardyce KR's dad?
If that was the case it would make the other Sam Allardyce the one that he signed, his....Blimey I never realised how alike they look. Is Allardyce KR's dad?
Half-brother (if via different mothers)If that was the case it would make the other Sam Allardyce the one that he signed, his....
Contract law applies in this caseOn a brighter note - this might reduce KR's severance payout. My limited understanding of UK employment law is that future employment (within the terminated period) reduces the individual's severance losses, and assuming no counter agreement is in place, therefore subsequently reduces any severance payout. As a principle of law, all employees have a legal duty to try and find work and mitigate their losses in severance situations. In KR's case, it has probably already been agreed upon and based on a one-off settlement, regardless or otherwise of future work, but it would be nice to know for sure.