OX14
Well-known member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 8,449
Is that definite, or an educated guess on your part, out of interest?
He's training with us so I guess it was him unless it was Twine of course
Is that definite, or an educated guess on your part, out of interest?
Thanks for that, no one had said so I thought it was a goerTwine isn’t coming to us, hate to be the one to break the news!
If he gets loaned out it will be to a championship side minimum.
DefiniteIs that definite, or an educated guess on your part, out of interest?
That is very true what Yanic and Murphy are gonna turn up you don’t know. Hope Murphycan perform. I’m not too bothered about Yanic. Browne always suspect to an injury. And you can’t rely on Goodrham to do it all I guess. I do think we should bring in another wide player imoDoes anyone else think that Manning might think he has Murphy, Browne, Goodrham and maybe Wildschut (if he doesn't go!) in the building so maybe he doesn't need any more wide players?
Certainly there is enough quality there but can LM get the best out of those players?
I imagine that Manning will be taking a slightly longer term approach to recruitment than just this window.Does anyone else think that Manning might think he has Murphy, Browne, Goodrham and maybe Wildschut (if he doesn't go!) in the building so maybe he doesn't need any more wide players?
Certainly there is enough quality there but can LM get the best out of those players?
I think he knows that for now he’s stuck with some of them and so can’t easily justify spending money on another to his boss. Hence his comment on Marley Watkins currently being on trial:Does anyone else think that Manning might think he has Murphy, Browne, Goodrham and maybe Wildschut (if he doesn't go!) in the building so maybe he doesn't need any more wide players?
Certainly there is enough quality there but can LM get the best out of those players?
I think he's obviously realistic in that it might be hard to move on some players he doesn't fancy. Two of those players seem quite risky to me. I trust Manning knows more than me though!Does anyone else think that Manning might think he has Murphy, Browne, Goodrham and maybe Wildschut (if he doesn't go!) in the building so maybe he doesn't need any more wide players?
Certainly there is enough quality there but can LM get the best out of those players?
Ah you’re an estate agent then, always a trustworthy professionAll I know, we have money coming from McNally when’s he’s sold. Manning had a good conversation with vk at Burnley, involving Scott twine coming to us on Loan. I would love to share information but I’ve had a certain “Scott twine” enquire about a property at my work. Information said one year rental needed.
Assume you have just seen that here.Isaak Davies from Cardiff is a maybe.
Maybe that's why the previously mentioned "Wide Guys" we've been linked with have not happened. Yet ?I think he knows that for now he’s stuck with some of them and so can’t easily justify spending money on another to his boss. Hence his comment on Marley Watkins currently being on trial:
“We currently carry quite big numbers so what it can’t be is at the expense of someone that we’ve got in.”
I think it’s pretty safe to say that he would like to replace one of them in particular.
Hmmmm… 5’9” according to wiki. Just what we need, a young, inexperienced, diminutive ‘forward’…
I think he would be played on the wing anyway and not directly up top.Hmmmm… 5’9” according to wiki. Just what we need, a young, inexperienced, diminutive ‘forward’…
Think Manning prefers to play with Forwards who are all interchangeable across the entire front 3 or in behind the front 3, think he wants our forward line to be able to be fluid & rotatable on the counter.I read up abit on him and he is more of a second striker or can play on the wing. Surely we are after an out an out striker now who can play up top (like Matty Taylor was).
Being linked with a London club and an Oxfordshire club?