Thomas/Brock/Jones
Well-known member
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2019
- Messages
- 4,577
Not impressed myself as I'd say it gives Fulham a way in to poach the local youngstersThat sounds interesting for City. Well done.
Well, we don't want to be a feeder club, let alone for a club like Fulham who we may well be sharing a league with fairly soon.I suppose the obvious question would be............... "Why not United? "
I think he meant why the link up wasn't with usWell, we don't want to be a feeder club, let alone for a club like Fulham who we may well be sharing a league with fairly soon.
Reread it that’s what he answeredI think he meant why the link up wasn't with us
Any idea how It will work ?Good commercial move for City.
Fulham are already able to poach kids in this area. I think it will mean some Fulham youngsters will be first blooded at CityNot impressed myself as I'd say it gives Fulham a way in to poach the local youngsters
No but the statement refers to recruitment and player development which I can only presume will be of benefit to OC, as I guess they won't have much of a scouting presence?Any idea how It will work ?
I guess we already have an unofficial linkup with CityFulham are already able to poach kids in this area. I think it will mean some Fulham youngsters will be first blooded at City
But that may well be finished if contracts signed exclusively to Fulham , to develop their players at a decent level.I guess we already have an unofficial linkup with City
Reread it that’s what he answered
For clarity - the thread is about City linking with Fulham.
My question is why they (City) haven`t linked with United.
Man United?I suppose the obvious question would be............... "Why not United? "
This should be a timely reminder to anyone who think Oxford City are their second team. They’re nothing but a threat to OUFC
Only one team in Oxford.
I know. Did you quote the wrong reply?For clarity - the thread is about City linking with Fulham.
My question is why they (City) haven`t linked with United.