Once again the Queen of misinformation is spouting off. (and as you read the forum, Hi Suzanne
)
You don't want OUFC to have the area as they are 'a private company', yet you are happy for a fencing company, which is privately owned, to have it. That is hypocrisy.
OUFC are 'a private company' only by a stretch of the definition. They are a community asset that has been in Oxfordshire for over 125 years. It isn't just a football team that plays 25 times a year in the county, it is a provider of opportunities for children to get active, for older people to stay active with their walking football teams, provide retired fans with a vital meeting place and entertainment with The Manor Club, and encourage the county's women and girls to get involved with sport through the excellent Oxford United Ladies team. This is just the tip of the iceberg in what the football club does for the wider community. Trying to put them down as merely 'a private company' shows ignorance on your part.
It won't be 'a squeeze' to get a stadium and facilities onto the Triangle, the space is adequate for this. Of course plans will have to be scaled back from the Stratfield Brake proposal, but there is a lot that can be done with what is available.
The forced vote that FoSB have left the parish council with is simply a way to try to get people on side before they know what the actual proposal contains. It is easier to continue to spread this misinformation before the details are known by the public. It is such a transparent desperation tactic.
The people of Kidlington have in the past been great supporters of their football team, only last year residents lined the roads for the funeral of Joey Beauchamp. Hopefully they won't be fooled by a group of antis who themselves bring nothing to their community, and the club of Oxfordshire can continue to bring benefits to the local population.