I think it's natural for a degree of skepticism to be on show in this thread and experience demonstrates that it's healthy to not swallow everything that owners, current or potential, dish up. Throw in our local government and their history of minimal support/dereliction of duty to their football club and the case for concern only strengthens. I don't think anyone should be pilloried for a pessimistic outlook. The off-field heritage of Oxford United demonstrates that pessimism and reality are often comfortable bed-fellows.
However, the current ownership group has done nothing but deliver a measured, professional (bar the initial cash-flow mismanagement) and conservative approach to their tenure, so I see less cause for abject gloom than we've previously endured. Bakrie's interview was slick, but it had substance and was delivered in a manner befitting someone representing serious, capable and ambitious people. Until he/they prove us wrong, I believe they've earned respect and a period of support, albeit with an air of caution. Few will want to run the risk of unconditional celebration ahead of some cold, hard and delivered truths.
Finally, the EFL dynamic is curious. On one hand, this forum has had pages filled with justifiable criticism of that particular body and their ineptitude, yet because some have inferred that the process has gone on for too long and see a conspiracy, those criticisms are not surfacing in the discussion.
I'm not popping champagne corks yet, far from it, but think that a little faith in both the owners and OxVox should be demonstrated and as supporters we should support both while their actions justify it.