Common Villager
Well-known member
- Joined
- 19 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 1,289
Two possibles.
1/ they may want way to much for him at this point. But it will come down as his contract does.
2/ his wages are way above what we can afford at this level.
Kr said loans would have to be better than what we have in that position, and be player we otherwise couldn’t afford. This would tick both those boxes for me
I'm absolutely not saying this isn't a good signing. I just always prefer permanent deals, especially given what we've experienced with Baldock and Payne being recalled in recent years.
Also, these were Tiger's words, not mine ?
'For example, we have a player in mind who we already agreed a loan but we want it to be permanent. Why add value to him for another club if he does well for us for a season?'