MarkG
Well-known member
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 4,563
I don't know. But it's worth looking at the changes in the majority shareholdings.Interesting point that. One of the key differences with the current takeover deal is that there was significant investment by equity rather than debt. So, it raises the question of whether any other funds have been put into the club and, if so, are they so insignificant that it wasn't considered necessary to secure them? Or, have those funds actually been provided to the holding company, and that's where the charges are held?
Just looking at the ordinary £1 shares for now ...
The 127,124 ord shares held by Firoka were bought by WPL. Ensco bought intitially 71,731 to give a 52% majority holding (including the Ord £7 shares), and then the balance of 55,393 taking it to 127,124 and 92%. Ensco then acquired a handful of other shares, transferred 6,943 to Peter Lee and then got them back again taking it to 127,167. In Feb 2018, £111,860 of Ensco loans were capitalised taking it to 239,027, and OIH paid £2.3 million cash for ordinary shares with a holding of 2,300,000.
This appears to be so that Ensco hasn't actually sold any of its ordinary shares but is now a sub 10% shareholder in the club, so that Eales was able to takeover Solihull Moors. It did also transfer just over 90% of its preference shares to OIH.
I wonder if the £111,860 is significant in that it perhaps reflects the balance of any loan due to Ensco on top of the secured loan notes of £4,275,708 / £3,275,708?
So another question that we won't know, is if the cash for shares that OIH acquired was for
A> just enough to get the Ensco holding below 10%
B> to repay some of the Ensco debt, leaving the "player" debt outstanding instalments
C> to inject cash into the club to meet day to day running costs / past bills due?
Last edited: