New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Planning

[Billyox]

Let me guess, main page?

Of course
But it all they have left completely clutching at straws
It's a new software only just been released that is why it wasn't used in the first place and Oufc agreed that they would do again with the new software.
If it hadn't come out they would just used the old software complete non story

 

[Billyox]

Even says in the story we was approved to use it on 7th of Feb we submitted planning on 26th of Feb can't just stop everything because of one tiny modeling which more or less will give same answers

 

[Marked Ox]

Oxford United 'wasting time' as it must resubmit traffic plans for new stadium

Oxford United has been criticised for “wasting the time” of residents and councillors it must resubmit its traffic modelling for its planned new…

www.oxfordmail.co.uk

More spouting rubbish from Fosb this new traffic modeling was mentioned as the planning application went live yet 3 weeks later fosb want to bring it up even tho Oufc have said they will be doing it

Loving the hypocrisy of McIvor about incorrect information:

She said: “We believe it is wrong for Oxford United to waste the time of parish councilors, community groups such as FoSB and individual local residents who voluntarily work on behalf of their communities by submitting incorrect information. »

Why should Oxford United care about FoSB's time when FoSB constantly make stuff up about the club, the application, the site, supporters and then flip flop on them etc etc so wasting OUFC's time.

Also Victoria Campbell's comments, she and FoSB would have been one of the first moaning if OUFC hadn't included that information.

And it is moaning over nothing as the club are adjusting the plans anyway based on the new model that has been introduced.


Not from the Oxford Mail article as I haven't looked at it but this one which may be a copy of or close to it:

404. That’s an error.

sky 24 Press News

news.sky24.press

 

[Concretebob]

Loving the hypocrisy of McIvor about incorrect information:

She said: “We believe it is wrong for Oxford United to waste the time of parish councilors, community groups such as FoSB and individual local residents who voluntarily work on behalf of their communities by submitting incorrect information. »

Why should Oxford United care about FoSB's time when FoSB constantly make stuff up about the club, the application, the site, supporters and then flip flop on them etc etc so wasting OUFC's time.

Also Victoria Campbell's comments, she and FoSB would have been one of the first moaning if OUFC hadn't included that information.

And it is moaning over nothing as the club are adjusting the plans anyway based on the new model that has been introduced.


Not from the Oxford Mail article as I haven't looked at it but this one which may be a copy of or close to it:

404. That’s an error.

sky 24 Press News

news.sky24.press

"Community Group" ! That's a joke, right? She's got some bloody front that woman accusing others of lies and misinformation.

 

[holdsteady]

As if McIvor has much else to do, this is basically her entire life.

 

[Billyox]

Guessing fosb are reading all those positive comments in the planning and not seeing many objections that carry any weight and are starting to panic

 

[LeftSideLarry]

Let me guess, main page?

It’s labelled an ‘EXCLUSIVE’

 

[OX14]

Loving the hypocrisy of McIvor about incorrect information:

She said: “We believe it is wrong for Oxford United to waste the time of parish councilors, community groups such as FoSB and individual local residents who voluntarily work on behalf of their communities by submitting incorrect information. »

Why should Oxford United care about FoSB's time when FoSB constantly make stuff up about the club, the application, the site, supporters and then flip flop on them etc etc so wasting OUFC's time.

Also Victoria Campbell's comments, she and FoSB would have been one of the first moaning if OUFC hadn't included that information.

And it is moaning over nothing as the club are adjusting the plans anyway based on the new model that has been introduced.


Not from the Oxford Mail article as I haven't looked at it but this one which may be a copy of or close to it:

404. That’s an error.

sky 24 Press News

news.sky24.press

 

[Headley]

It's not even news, it was clearly stated by the club that there would be additional modeling, if this is the best they can write about then it's on the right track

 

[Berliner]

Boycott the Oxford Mail, simple as that. Assign one person here with copying and pasting any articles on the stadium here in the forum so they don't get the traffic on the link.

 

[Billyox]

It's not even news, it was clearly stated by the club that there would be additional modeling, if this is the best they can write about then it's on the right track

It was definitely said im trying to find it

 

[Concretebob]

 

[Concretebob]

As if McIvor has much else to do, this is basically her entire life.

You'd think a woman who is a director of a company with half a million in the bank would have better things to do!

 

[Billyox]

I knew I had read it somewhere it's was in the planning application

 

[Concretebob]

I knew I had read it somewhere it's was in the planning application

View attachment 18475

"Once access is granted"

Has the access been granted then? Because if it hasn't, then the Foolish Oxford Snobs & Busybodies (copyright @Colin B ) are talking nonsense yet again.

 

[Oxymoron]

So, once again the club is following the procedures and processes mandated by the local planning authority (you can put your cheque book down Steve, no chance of a Judicial Review on that showing) and yet opposition groups are calling it out as a "waste of time".

You would think that people that sit on the planning committee would have a grasp of these things.....

 

[m]

You would think that people that sit on the planning committee would have a grasp of these things.....

Would you? Would you really?

 

[Billyox]

They fosb have lost on absolutely every thing first comment on the planning portal from them about bats was ripped apart in the planning application

The bridge again ripped Apart as we then said we would be submitting one shortly

And now this straw clutching at the very least

 

[Royalstandard74]

This lot could make up the controlling group of CDC in six weeks time .

They'd have have to come up with some exceptional objections apart from their xenophobia, classism and worrying about a sainsbury's parking space, to object to a groundbreaking environmental, employment and community asset to name a few development.

 

[Chrisox]

Boycott the Oxford Mail, simple as that. Assign one person here with copying and pasting any articles on the stadium here in the forum so they don't get the traffic on the link.

Boycotted it a long time ago why are people looking at it the Fail is no friend of oufc