They all seem to be doing well with City so good luck to the lad!
Yes. A move for all parties.
They all seem to be doing well with City so good luck to the lad!
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport...ws/transfer-news-live-rangers-celtic-21204917
Stephen O’Donnell rumour can be found here.
?is that Mackie on the left?
Lofthouse's winner the other day was good to watch. I hope he can have a similar preseason with us as Shandon did in Ireland 2018, really push for some first team minutes.They all seem to be doing well with City so good luck to the lad!
Haven't seen much of him but, he seems to be banging them in regularly! Hope he comes back to us in pre-season, full of confidence! Could learn a lot, alongside Mackie and Taylor (assuming they both stay)Lofthouse's winner the other day was good to watch. I hope he can have a similar preseason with us as Shandon did in Ireland 2018, really push for some first team minutes.
That’s my feeling, he’s good to watch but hasn’t had much end product going forwardWhat are Cadden’s underlying numbers this year? Assists etc? Eye test alone is obviously good but for me 750k seems excessive, especially if he hasn’t actually had much end product.
IMO Cadden has been fairly good positionally, however his crossing over the last few weeks has been woeful to say the least. Think 800k for a fullback with fairly limited delivery is excessive.
What are Cadden’s underlying numbers this year? Assists etc? Eye test alone is obviously good but for me 750k seems excessive, especially if he hasn’t actually had much end product.
Limited delivery after a couple of poor games in your opinion?IMO Cadden has been fairly good positionally, however his crossing over the last few weeks has been woeful to say the least. Think 800k for a fullback with fairly limited delivery is excessive.
I can see where they are coming from if it is true the bid is highMy understanding is robbo wouldn't want to pay that sort of money for Cadden. But the board see him as an investment not just a player.
View attachment 2674
@ttg17 as you can see, despite people saying his deliveries are limited, he has contributed heavily towards our attacking success. This was put together at the start of December so the data may be slightly different, at this point. I don't think we can say that 800k for Cadden is excessive when we expect teams to pay millions for our players. I think 800k is a good deal, considering his age and potential re-sale value.
He is one of, if not THE best RB in League 1 and the data backs that up.
Fair enough!View attachment 2674
@ttg17 as you can see, despite people saying his deliveries are limited, he has contributed heavily towards our attacking success. This was put together at the start of December so the data may be slightly different, at this point. I don't think we can say that 800k for Cadden is excessive when we expect teams to pay millions for our players. I think 800k is a good deal, considering his age and potential re-sale value.
He is one of, if not THE best RB in League 1 and the data backs that up.
They're quality, mate! Love looking at the analytics you provide on Twitter and I hope you dont mind me popping that on here, for the sake of making my point.Will be updating these in the coming days. Will be looking at RB options on a blog
View attachment 2674
@ttg17 as you can see, despite people saying his deliveries are limited, he has contributed heavily towards our attacking success. This was put together at the start of December so the data may be slightly different, at this point. I don't think we can say that 800k for Cadden is excessive when we expect teams to pay millions for our players. I think 800k is a good deal, considering his age and potential re-sale value.
He is one of, if not THE best RB in League 1 and the data backs that up.
I too, love a bit of data! This is all @Shosho though. Really interesting stuffLovely bit of data, i'll keep quiet
They're quality, mate! Love looking at the analytics you provide on Twitter and I hope you dont mind me popping that on here, for the sake of making my point.