Jaboysmith
Active member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 829
Like an apprenticeshipSo nice of us to pay Baldock while he does his degree.
If we run it as a higher level apprenticeship we should get some government funding.Like an apprenticeship
A month? The fifteen minute intro should do the trick.Could we not employ him as chairman or CEO? After a month on that course he will already be more qualified than who we currently have.
You are still missing the point.This is the exact point I was trying to make. Paying Baldock 3/4k per week when he isn't playing or even likely to is a complete waste of money. Pay him up and get somebody else in.
True, but don't forget that McNally was a full-time student, playing semi-pro, until he was 20/21Not quite a fair comparison though, they started at a lower level but let's remember McNally is on loan because he couldn't get a sniff of a game at a Championship team for the first six months of the season, albeit a very good one. By the time they were McNallys age Stones had played 100 odd Premier League games and 20 or so times for England and moved for 50m. Gomez went to Liverpool as a teenager and had a good handful of England caps, Holding was established at Arsenal too.
Maguire is the most similar in terms of career path but even he had played a good amount of Premier League games by this point in his career. I'd love to see him succeed and think he's got a shot of spending a chunk of his career in the top division but I think talk of playing for a top 6 team is very fanciful.
I wonder if we could give him a coaching role now that LBS has moved on so that he’s off of the player budget?You are still missing the point.
Our budget is not an endless pot of money.
Please read this carefully and try and understand.
You have a squad of players, you have a budget of x amount
You pay Baldock off with 150/200 k we are now down that amount on the budget so we can’t spend it on extra players.
Is that clear enough
I wonder if we could give him a coaching role now that LBS has moved on so that he’s off of the player budget?
We will end with a very large coaching staff if that is our way of solving the mess that Robinsons left behind.
Any evidence of this?All this talk of budget, paying off player's contracts etc. it all comes to nothing when the CEO and Chairman are telling their employers that the squad already has 20 pro's on the books and we don't need to do much (if any) recruiting.
,there will certainly be more players moving out and much better ones coming in .They want to be near the top of the table
Yes I remember that was the case.On Baldock, I'm quite sure both him and Jones are/were on pay-as-you-play deals.
If that is the case, it makes more sense to keep Baldock on than pay him off.. despite him being injured and unlikely to play again, there's probably some legal hurdles if we tried to pay him off.Yes I remember that was the case.