What was incorrect with Mr Hill's statement?
I'd like to email my local councillor and ask them to disregard and strike from the record his statement but I'm struggling to articulate it. So far I have the following rough notes:
1 - Experience and competence of those involved: Thohir at DC United built a stadium, government minister for State owned enterprises in Indonesia, International Olympic committee member. Ex owner of Inter Milan, DC United and various other teams in multiple sports.
Bakrie: Google shows his education and career which I'll put in. MBA from Stanford.
Tiger, encumbent Owner who's injected millions, prior experience at Reading.
Funding: Potential stadium will be owned by PropCo owned by the board and wedded to the club who will pay a peppercorn rent as confirmed this week. Net worth of Thohir individually is estimated at $157million USD and family wealth of $2.6 billion USD.
Bakrie individual net worth $1.5billion USD.
On ground sharing, that's a last resort for any club when in severe financial difficulties. I'm sure OCC do not wish to lose a asset which means so much to so many to another county. Not a viable option.
I'll put that into full sentences when I email but are there any other inaccuracies I can call out?