38yearsofpain
Well-known member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 1,121
Pate or paste toastie maybe but certainly a Brexiteer painful tunaCan you toast fish in it?
Pate or paste toastie maybe but certainly a Brexiteer painful tunaCan you toast fish in it?
Gammon toasties are popular, I hear
... but what do you think though?Most rational folk understand it will be a fudge of some kind and there will be another several years of wrangling over stuff.
It sounds like the Oxford vaccine could be approved in the next couple of weeks.Unfortunately the mass approval and start of the Oxford vaccine has been delayed (otherwise we would have got that news last Friday or Saturday at the same time as the Tier 4 announcement).
Looks like the hope is to announce a Brexit deal at the same time as the announcement of a national lockdown.
Nothing like good government, eh?
... but what do you think though?
Is this a Jeopardy question? Is the answer "what will Brexit mean?"A percentage of folk will be happy, a similar percentage won`t be happy and a big chunk will just get on with it.
With a side dish of bitter losers?
Most rational folk understand it will be a fudge of some kind and there will be another several years of wrangling over stuff.
Β£60million vs toaster.It would be like negotiating to buy a Β£100,000 house, but then letting the deal fall apart because the sellers wouldn't throw in a Β£50 toaster.
Yes, you might really like the toaster - and it's perfectly fine to ask for it to be thrown in with the house - but if that ends up being what's holding up negotiations, then you let it go for the sake of getting the wider deal done. Especially when you know that the toaster has much more value to the other side.
Yeah I agree our GDP in 2019 was 2.17 trillion (apparently), so not a toaster, more like haggling over a peanut.Β£60million vs toaster.
I get it, scale and all that. But this is Β£60millon and not a toaster.
If the negotiation had gone smoothly and there were no other snagging points I might agree with you. But given the other trade offs which will have needed to be made, there comes a point where either party needs to stop bending.Yeah I agree our GDP in 2019 was 2.17 trillion (apparently), so not a toaster, more like haggling over a peanut.
If the negotiation had gone smoothly and there were no other snagging points I might agree with you. But given the other trade offs which will have needed to be made, there comes a point where either party needs to stop bending.
The territory which fishing grounds represent will also have been a factor and possibly more important than the value itself.
Yes, we bought more from the EU as a whole than we sold to them last year - so they made money out of us in that way (about Β£80 billion). But unless proper trading relations are established, trade both ways will be subject to duties etc - so there will be less trade. And while we exported 44% (!!!) of stuff we make to the EU, their trade with us was a much smaller 8%. If trade is damaged, who do you think will suffer most? One country losing nearly half their export trade or a large group of countries spreading an 8% loss between them?They need us marginally more than we need them s....