dickwalton1964
Well-known member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 3,035
Sunderland would have to be Bonkers to release such a player to a promotion rival
Maybe but such moves do happen.
Sunderland would have to be Bonkers to release such a player to a promotion rival
Sunderland would have to be Bonkers to release such a player to a promotion rival
My understanding, for what it's worth, is that a loan deal was favouable to the club and MT in the summer, with the option of signing a permanent deal now. I'm not sure that the club could have done anything more, but I believe that MT wants to keep his options open until the summer but is still favouring a deal to remain. Bristol City would want a nominal fee to do a deal now, and we would also be paying a decent wage to a player for the next 30 months with no guarantees of success. So I do think that the club can look at using their resouces better to bring in another striker plus 1 or 2 full backs. We do not have an unlimited transfer budget and we need to use that wisely. I would think that a season long loan for Taylor is good business rather than a stick to beat the club with.A very familiar story for both player and club...it does come across generally that we can identify decent players but struggle to get them to put pen to paper certainly in the permanent category.This strikes me more so in the Jan windows which should be done away with as i feel just leads to managers getting lazy and seeking to fill squads with Loans rather than building our own squad.
Sometimes it's not just about numbers and I do get the feeling that yet again come the summer we are going to go through this all again whatever league we are in.
My understanding, for what it's worth, is that a loan deal was favouable to the club and MT in the summer, with the option of signing a permanent deal now. I'm not sure that the club could have done anything more, but I believe that MT wants to keep his options open until the summer but is still favouring a deal to remain. Bristol City would want a nominal fee to do a deal now, and we would also be paying a decent wage to a player for the next 30 months with no guarantees of success. So I do think that the club can look at using their resouces better to bring in another striker plus 1 or 2 full backs. We do not have an unlimited transfer budget and we need to use that wisely. I would think that a season long loan for Taylor is good business rather than a stick to beat the club with.
For those of us aged 40+, Taylor reminds me of Paul Moody. Not in style of play but in ability at Championship vs L1. Moody was brilliant in the old Division 3 (now L1), but wasn't anywhere near as effective in what is now the Championship. I suspect Taylor may be a player who will consistently get 20+ goals in L1, but very few in the Championship. In which case, it makes sense to review in the Summer. If we are L1, sign him permanently, if we can. If we are Championship, we may well look elsewhere.not so sure about that, his goals per game average is very good can you name a striker with similar stats available at the moment, if taylor goes on and scores say another 10 goals for us for the remainder of the season our chance may have gone....... who knows ay
Played against us in the Carabao Cup. Don't recall him standing out, though.Jason Mccarthy - right back at Millwall is set to leave on loan. Lots of L1 interest. Could he be a target.
For those of us aged 40+, Taylor reminds me of Paul Moody. Not in style of play but in ability at Championship vs L1. Moody was brilliant in the old Division 3 (now L1), but wasn't anywhere near as effective in what is now the Championship. I suspect Taylor may be a player who will consistently get 20+ goals in L1, but very few in the Championship. In which case, it makes sense to review in the Summer. If we are L1, sign him permanently, if we can. If we are Championship, we may well look elsewhere.
KR does not see the next level as too high for MT. I suspect that he sees MT as very capable of playing and scoring in the Championship ( as did Charlton)sorry but again i do not get that, if we had ambition to reach the championship why would we offer a 2.1/2 year deal to a player who it might be thought the next level is 1 too high as indeed Mapp thought about Hilton?
KR does not see the next level as too high for MT. I suspect that he sees MT as very capable of playing and scoring in the Championship ( as did Charlton)
It sounds like Bristol C expected MT to come deep and play a very different type of game.
Peterborough sign Sammie Szmodics on loan from Bristol City. Great signing
Because as yet we don't know which division we will be in next year? Taylor might think he is good enough for the Championship and be happy to play there either with us or (if we don't go up) another club. Or he might want to guarantee higher wages if we are promoted? Obviously, nothing has changed since he came to us except the league position - I wonder if that's giving him pause for thought?But Scotchers has suggested we and MT will wait now until seasons end and surely with a 2.1/2 deal on the table MT would snap that up? so why would either or both have a sudden change of thought process which again exposes the loan system and our ability to seal deals we actually want.
I reckon that if we go up MT will sign for us.But Scotchers has suggested we and MT will wait now until seasons end and surely with a 2.1/2 deal on the table MT would snap that up? so why would either or both have a sudden change of thought process which again exposes the loan system and our ability to seal deals we actually want.
And of course, neither is true.
Because as yet we don't know which division we will be in next year? Taylor might think he is good enough for the Championship and be happy to play there either with us or (if we don't go up) another club. Or he might want to guarantee higher wages if we are promoted? Obviously, nothing has changed since he came to us except the league position - I wonder if that's giving him pause for thought?
?? Confused.in which case he would not have allowed a loan with a 2.1/2 year deal to sign now..he would just say season long loan (Bristol still can recall him) as in Jan you would know no more about next season as last summer.
We don't know on what terms the (rumoured) deal has been offered to him. The loan was a good idea for him no matter what was on offer - he needed to play, and was pretty sure of being the top dog striker with us. Shop window and all that. Any offer of a deal later would have given him some extra security and he has the choice of what he wants to do in the summer - accept that or take an offer elsewhere.in which case he would not have allowed a loan with a 2.1/2 year deal to sign now..he would just say season long loan (Bristol still can recall him) as in Jan you would know no more about next season as last summer.
There have been talks about a deal, MT said as much, but hes never seemed super keen. Certainly not the 2.5 year formality Scotchers suggested.in which case he would not have allowed a loan with a 2.1/2 year deal to sign now..he would just say season long loan (Bristol still can recall him) as in Jan you would know no more about next season as last summer.
Do people still think we have a better squad than them?Peterborough sign Sammie Szmodics on loan from Bristol City. Great signing