Revamped plans for a controversial European Super League are announced after a top court rules that banning clubs from joining a breakaway league was unlawful.
www.bbc.co.uk
Might not be so good for A22 as the original interpretations suggested if this from the above article is to be believed:
"All advantage lies with Uefa
Analysis from Miguel Delaney - chief football writer at The Independent
All anybody really cares about is can a European Super League be launched?
And what this judgement does is say it is still immensely complicated.
All advantage lies with Uefa and crucially the Super League would still have to get authorisation from Uefa.
What today's ruling does is it basically preserves the power of the governing bodies. It makes it clear that legally sporting merit needs to be protected."
As an aside, the names for the leagues are truly awful. Well they've got 2 clubs I suppose, only another 62 to get and they couldn't get 15 initially.
Also, if all games are streamed free, where is the income going to come from?