I agree - but Im not scared (yet)Very poor game of football, we really do lack ideas in the final 3rd I'm afraid
Don’t agree re the oppo. Thought Wigan were pretty good once they scored. Had some decent technical players. And more pace then us.Harris has got to find a new dimension to his game. He’s been on the periphery of games more often than he’s been decisive. When teams drop their line, he seems completely incapable of getting involved. This is where I thought Perkins would be the perfect alternative as he’s more of a false 9 and without him, teams only have to think about playing one way against us as we can't change it.
I completely agree that Edwards’ absence has created a void we can’t fill and it’s sucked all of the unpredictability out of our attack. He is that player who can create something out of nothing on a regular basis and pins people back. When that’s missing and Rodrigues is kicked out of the game as he was last night, we are reliant on players who just revert to safe movement of the ball. Mills, to his credit, at least tried to make things happen but with zero support from Long who took the easy out all game and brought nothing positive to our play.
Brannagan is a bigger miss than I anticipated. He would’ve had a field day yesterday from range and I wouldn’t have bet against him popping one in. As annoying as it is when he shoots with passes on, it at least gives the opponent something else to worry about. When he’s missing, we are completely shot shy and teams can just focus on defending their box and crowding players out.
We were frighteningly easy to play against yesterday, reminiscent of Cambridge. I thought Wigan were dreadful in the main but executed a good defensive game plan of getting up the arses of our better creative players before they could turn. Need to let the shackles off a bit on Saturday.
Defensively, they were decent. Nothing complicated. They swarmed McGuane and Rodrigues, stopped them turning and gave the space to the players who won’t hurt them. Not rocket science sometimes. But going forward I thought they were distinctly average. Carlisle put more patterns of play together.Don’t agree re the oppo. Thought Wigan were pretty good once they scored. Had some decent technical players. And more pace then us.
Harris had zilch support. (Apart from Leigh.) . He needs runners off. There were none last night
Mills disappeared after half time.
As posted earlier, there was a real lack of energy . All over the pitch. A very poor evening.
This is absolutely word perfect in my opinion. Without Brannagan putting some steel into the side we do look very soft. Brannagan (and McGuane to a lesser extent) allow Rodriguez and Leigh to do what they do. Without CB we look a bit lightweight. We will be very vulnerable if he is out for a long time at any point.I think it’s fair to say that a minority of our fanbase don’t appreciate what Brannagan brings to the team, but I think his impact is highlighted by how conspicuous his absence is on our team. He’s the alpha dog in midfield, can put in a tackle and crucially is always looking to drive us forward which has been so sorely missed recently with our ticky-tack sideways passing. His expansive passing to the flanks is also missed (especially now we have the rapid Mills who can take advantage of this), and most importantly he will pull the trigger to shoot when there’s an opening. We need him back in the worst possible way and he is the heartbeat of this team.
Their first goal was completely against the run of play. Just before they scored, I'd commented that I didn't think they'd even touched the ball!! We kept the ball, passed it well, but no end product. Second half, we looked flat. Harris kept losing the ball up front, Goodrham was anonymous whist on the pitch, but I thought Mills looked threatening when on the ball. Like Saturday, the subs had no impact, although G'OD looked like he was up for it. From where I was sat, I thought Beadle should have done better for both goals.Also think the poor second half completely overshadowed the first half performance which was decent, if lacking in cutting edge. Got caught by a sucker punch and final ball wasn't quite there, but generally the build up play was good and we frankly dominated. Shouldn't be forgotten, even if the scoreline was disappointing.
It was totally against the run of play! We had twenty minutes of PhD-level advanced footballology in their half, then they booted it down the hill and ran after it, 1-0.Their first goal was completely against the run of play. Just before they scored, I'd commented that didn't think they'd even touched the ball!! We kept the ball, passed it well, but no end product. Second half, we looked flat. Harris kept losing the ball up front, Goodrham was anonymous whist on the pitch, but I thought Mills looked threatening when on the ball. Like Saturday, the subs had no impact, although G'OD looked like he was up for it. From where I was sat, I thought Beadle should have done better for both goals.
At times that's all you need though. 10 minutes of keepball against a well organised team with nothing to show for it counts for nothing!!It was totally against the run of play! We had twenty minutes of PhD-level advanced footballology in their half, then they booted it down the hill and ran after it, 1-0.
Yes agree, they weren't a bad side, they didn't cheat or foul, they defended really well and had some paceAt times that's all you need though. 10 minutes of keepball against a well organised team with nothing to show for it counts for nothing!!
They only had 28% possession at Exeter and did exactly the same to them, 2-0 .
We had 65% possession at Wigan and did nothing in attack of note. Pretty non attacking possession counts for nothing unless it leads to goalscoring opportunities.
It counts for nothing if you ignore that we have a lot more points than they doAt times that's all you need though. 10 minutes of keepball against a well organised team with nothing to show for it counts for nothing!!
They only had 28% possession at Exeter and did exactly the same to them, 2-0 .
We had 65% possession at Wigan and did nothing in attack of note. Pretty non attacking possession counts for nothing unless it leads to goalscoring opportunities.
At one point first half we had 86% possession.Their first goal was completely against the run of play. Just before they scored, I'd commented that didn't think they'd even touched the ball!! We kept the ball, passed it well, but no end product. Second half, we looked flat. Harris kept losing the ball up front, Goodrham was anonymous whist on the pitch, but I thought Mills looked threatening when on the ball. Like Saturday, the subs had no impact, although G'OD looked like he was up for it. From where I was sat, I thought Beadle should have done better for both goals.
That is of course true (although they have of course had a deduction).It counts for nothing if you ignore that we have a lot more points than they do