New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Planning

PotterToWrapItUp said:
Can we just bin the whole stadium idea and stage a 365 day beer festival on the site?
Click to expand...
Who even needs a stadium? Just need jumpers for goal posts, then whoever's ball it is says who plays, and when it's time to go home regardless of the score line the next goal wins.
 
Billyox said:
Here he is boys and girls it's what you have been waiting for View attachment 18111
Click to expand...
Sounds like a defeated man to me. Contradicting his "green credentials" to advocate private car usage and forgetting that OUFC have no say on a road closure.

Not forgetting his enthusiastic support for LTNs elsewhere in the county. You're a hypocrite Middleton.
 
Do you remember which document that was in
Oxymoron said:
I haven't read every document (Has anyone? Will anyone?) but one of the one's I have downloaded states that traffic will be controlled by having marshals at the crossing points when large crowds are expected - closure was not mentioned.
Click to expand...
 
Has anyone noticed anything different in the plans to when they were shown at the consultation events last year?

They don't appear to have taken any notice of the comments back then of the very small bar area or roof height at the home support end.
 
OUFCwaffle said:
Has anyone managed to find in the documents which area(s) the safe standing will be?

Edit found it: This safe standing for the north stand and away corner.
View attachment 18105

We need to push the club to put safe standing behind both goals. The atmosphere will be better in the south stand.
Click to expand...
Which document is that from, as I can't find it.
 
ljs said:
Has anyone noticed anything different in the plans to when they were shown at the consultation events last year?

They don't appear to have taken any notice of the comments back then of the very small bar area or roof height at the home support end.
Click to expand...
Nope, lots of us made suggestions on this, also the location of the safe standing area. All appears to have been ignored.

Screenshot_20240306-064632__01.jpg

Screenshot_20240306-064739__01.jpg

Looking at the sections with the scale line. The south stand has 26 rows of seats (row z). The height of the roof from the top row is approximately 7m. Contrast to the north stand which has only 22 rows of seats (row v) and a roof height between the top row of approximately 15m, that's over double the height with fewer rows of fans.
 
Last edited:
Why can’t some of the toilets have flexible allocation depending on the event? E.g for mens football a bunch of them could be swapped for men to use and then for an event with a higher female attendance change the sign over? Ok these ones will be cubicle only but I’m pretty sure at the O2 for boxing I’ve been in men’s toilets and they were only cubicles (most likely as they swapped them from women’s)
 
OUFCwaffle said:
Nope, lots of us made suggestions on this, also the location of the safe standing area. All appears to have been ignored.

View attachment 18118

View attachment 18119

Looking at the sections with the scale line. The south stand has 26 rows of seats (row z). The height of the roof from the top row is approximately 7m. Contrast to the north stand which has only 22 rows of seats (row v) and a roof height between the top row of approximately 15m, that's over double the height with fewer rows of fans.
Click to expand...
ljs said:
Has anyone noticed anything different in the plans to when they were shown at the consultation events last year?

They don't appear to have taken any notice of the comments back then of the very small bar area or roof height at the home support end.
Click to expand...

Can't please everyone. Thousands of different opinions.
 
Billyox said:
Here he is boys and girls it's what you have been waiting for View attachment 18111
Click to expand...

On this occasion he does appear to have a point. One for the fans forum tomorrow night.

OCC will not sign the lease and Liz Leffman has specifically mentioned a bridge.

It's the only way OCC can stop the stadium so they won't give any leeway on that.
 
Last edited:
Orkney Islands Yellow said:
On this occasion he does appear to have a point. One for the fans forum tomorrow night.
Click to expand...
But only when it's full capacity I believe, which if we take it as at the kassam how many games he had that's been full capacity not many in 20 odd years.
There has to be some give and take on this issue, we have cut it down from 2 hours to half an hour we have cut it from every game to just high attendance. at the end of the day it's occ and highway who makes that decision to close a road not Oufc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Land Deal
722 723 724
Replies
14K
Views
927K
Northstandboy
Northstandboy
brightonyellow
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - Stratfield Brake
304 305 306
Replies
6K
Views
414K
ljs
L
MarkG
What will happen to the Kassam stadium?
2
Replies
29
Views
1K
stokeu
stokeu
OUSP
Call to Action Stadium Planning
Replies
4
Views
620
OUSP
OUSP
OUFCwaffle
Study: New stadium location of safe standing model.
Replies
14
Views
1K
ljs
L
Back
Top Bottom