Nail hit head. She simply does not like others having fun. Especially if they are "beneath" her.
to be a true community group, shouldnt said group, be doing things to benefit the entire community. for example, a group claiming to to Friends of a certain area, would be expected to be physically doing things to benefit the community. A group with the name Friends of Stratfield Brake, IF they were a genuine community group would be clearing up dog poo on the pitches of the sports ground on a regular basis, and even aranising working parties of volunteers to try and help improving drainage on the ofter waterlogged sports pitches. FoSB are NOT a community group in any shape or formLoving the hypocrisy of McIvor about incorrect information:
She said: “We believe it is wrong for Oxford United to waste the time of parish councilors, community groups such as FoSB and individual local residents who voluntarily work on behalf of their communities by submitting incorrect information. »
Why should Oxford United care about FoSB's time when FoSB constantly make stuff up about the club, the application, the site, supporters and then flip flop on them etc etc so wasting OUFC's time.
Also Victoria Campbell's comments, she and FoSB would have been one of the first moaning if OUFC hadn't included that information.
And it is moaning over nothing as the club are adjusting the plans anyway based on the new model that has been introduced.
Not from the Oxford Mail article as I haven't looked at it but this one which may be a copy of or close to it:
He is completely and utterly unprofessional and a disgrace to his political party.
Unlike fosb and Ian, danny I've poured over that planning application most of it I've no clue but some of it does stick in my head
Excellent work Billy.
Your welcome doing it all for us
It's a pity the ox fail cannot apply the same diligence before publishing their friends rubbish.
It appears that fosb shout jump and Oxford mail replies how high
Have we ever found out who FoSB's "person on the inside" at the Oxford Fail is?
Is this going to delay OUFC and their application?
No it will be ammended as and when it's done and resubmitted I very much doubt it will make a big difference to any answers
What work other than trying to nobble everything OUFC are trying to do. Mcivor claiming that FOSB work voluntarily for their communities. B*****s what a lieLoving the hypocrisy of McIvor about incorrect information:
She said: “We believe it is wrong for Oxford United to waste the time of parish councilors, community groups such as FoSB and individual local residents who voluntarily work on behalf of their communities by submitting incorrect information. »
Why should Oxford United care about FoSB's time when FoSB constantly make stuff up about the club, the application, the site, supporters and then flip flop on them etc etc so wasting OUFC's time.
Also Victoria Campbell's comments, she and FoSB would have been one of the first moaning if OUFC hadn't included that information.
And it is moaning over nothing as the club are adjusting the plans anyway based on the new model that has been introduced.
Not from the Oxford Mail article as I haven't looked at it but this one which may be a copy of or close to it:
