Wandering Yellow
Well-known member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 5,529
Amazing what you could get away with back thenSurprised we're still having this conversation on criteria when Ali solved it back in 2002
Amazing what you could get away with back thenSurprised we're still having this conversation on criteria when Ali solved it back in 2002
You do realise that someone seeking asylum doesn't have to have a high skill set don't you? You are mixing them up with migrants.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-london-68164010
- The BBC understands that Ezedi was twice turned down for asylum before being granted it in the end
Brain surgeon? Dentist? Anything useful?
You do realise that someone seeking asylum doesn't have to have a high skill set don't you? You are mixing them up with migrants.
I would like them to be able to play across the front three.
So you are discriminating against those who can only defend on the right of a 4?I would like them to be able to play across the front three.
You do realise that someone seeking asylum doesn't have to have a high skill set don't you? You are mixing them up with migrants.
Well at least his application was considered by a well funded and fully accountable immigration agency by a government trying to ensure everyone is properly processed…..Sounds like his asylum claim was a little "flakey" at best.............. wonder how he got here?
Shall we take a guess?
Sounds like his asylum claim was a little "flakey" at best.............. wonder how he got here?
Shall we take a guess?
Well that is a shock.
Ezedi was convicted of "sexual assault/exposure" in 2018, before being granted asylum in 2021 or 2022.
BBC News understands that Ezedi arrived in the UK by lorry in 2016, having travelled from Afghanistan.
His sentence for the sexual offence, passed down at Newcastle Crown Court, included an unpaid work order.
Once that was complete in 2020, Ezedi was discharged from probation supervision.
His asylum application was twice turned down, but granted on the third occasion when he claimed to have converted to Christianity, and that being returned to Afghanistan was therefore a risk.
Nope, not playing the system, not helped by "good people".............
Its the party you support which have created this situation with their (lack of) governanceSounds like his asylum claim was a little "flakey" at best.............. wonder how he got here?
Shall we take a guess?
Why is it that it’s always the brown person / Eastern European who is at fault in your posts?
So the guys a crook, surely a government that is tough on immigration and crime would have invested properly in a process that prevented him being able to do this……
Whichever way you look at this “look over there” policy it’s the successive Tory governments that have mismanaged it so that we get to this point.
Meanwhile real people are still furious at trusses crew for making us way worse off and the rest of this government partying while we buried our dead.
When have you raised an immigration case that hasn’t involved brown people or Eastern Europeans? Seriously I’ll wait.Their colour or country of origin isn`t my problem, its just an accompanying fact.
This individual has arrived illegally, played the system (likely supported by those who know it) and has chosen not to play by our rules is a problem.
If he had been sentenced to 12 months or more he would be up for deportation under s32 of the UK Borders Act 2007
Maybe any asylum seeker who gets convicted of a crime should be deported?
Good job he "converted to Christianity" before throwing a corrosive substance eh?
All you do is come on here and criticise the Conservative government's running of the asylum system. Can't you give them a break for once, they are honestly doing their best.*Their colour or country of origin isn`t my problem, its just an accompanying fact.
This individual has arrived illegally, played the system (likely supported by those who know it) and has chosen not to play by our rules is a problem.
If he had been sentenced to 12 months or more he would be up for deportation under s32 of the UK Borders Act 2007
Maybe any asylum seeker who gets convicted of a crime should be deported?
Good job he "converted to Christianity" before throwing a corrosive substance eh?
How many acid attackers are immigrant and how many are UK born, I wonder?
What exactly is it that you are trying to imply by highlighting this case specifically?
That there are bad people in the world and they do bad things?
That acid attacks are a heinous crime?
That he shouldn't have had the opportunity to commit said crime?
If it's the latter (and I very much suspect it is), Let's discuss sensibly how and why the opportunity arose and whether anything the government is doing or planning to do on law, order and immigration right now, would've prevented it.
For what it's worth, I don't think there's a single point of failure here, but many missed opportunities to prevent this from happening, regardless of how he arrived in the country (which really does seem to be your main point here). It would be a little obtuse to suggest otherwise, wouldn't it?
All you do is come on here and criticise the Conservative government's running of the asylum system. Can't you give them a break for once, they are honestly doing their best.*
* They're just not very good.
Is the fascist Nigel Farage your poster boy?Too many loopholes are left eg: "Converting to Christianity" and, surprisingly, after 2 failed applications, he can`t go home for fear of his life.
He`s milked the system.