General New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Land Deal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Billyox said:
Ian has responded he's not even talking about the triangle but about sb

My response to him

Following calculations undertaken using the DEFRA Biodiversity Metric 3.1
Calculation Tool, it can be seen that a net gain in biodiversity will not be delivered
for habitats as a result of the proposed development however, a gain in hedgerows
will be achieved. Specifically, the development will essentially ‘break even’ in
habitat units (from 36.76 units to 36.75 units, equating to a 0.01% decrease) and
an increase in hedgerow units from approximately 27.27 units to 38.29 units
(which equates to a 40.41% increase). The DEFRA Biodiversity Metric 3.1

Those understand that maybe able help me out does that mean it will just about make the 10%
View attachment 15463
Click to expand...

Time to go after him with some evidence. He’s been very sneaky and selective with his sources of evidence.

The devil is in the detail though. I’ll hit him back with facts.
 
SteMerritt said:
So, to summarise what he put: "No, I don't have any facts. But here is some information about a different proposal, which I've twisted to in an attempt to make a point on this one."

Glad he's cleared that up for us.
Click to expand...
Yarton's own Chester V - any misinformation he can find to boost his own self importance (to himself- albeit he seems to have the illusion of his intellectual superiority over everyone else)
 
Billyox said:
Do you want the link to the report?
Click to expand...

Got it, thanks, Billy. I remember reading it at the time.

Genuinely though, I want to see biodiversity improved at the site. It’s shitty to just pave over everything so to add planters, wildflowers, bat boxes etc to it isn’t just a good thing for nature but makes it appealing to humankind too.
 
Last edited:
Colin B said:
Below is an addendum, from David Robey, Chair of KCC, which he wants to add to their anti stadium stance, that they will discuss at the KCC meeting tonight.

Suggested addition to the draft letter stating our position on the consultations.

In the first OCC online consultation, out of 822 Kidlington and Gosford & Water Eaton respondents 38% were in favour of taking the stadium proposal forward and 58 per cent were against. In the Parish Poll held in May of this year 928 Kidlington electors supported the proposal and 2,073 voted no, a turnout of 29.99%. The analysis of the County Council’s recent engagement exercise substantially supports these results: residents living within a 2-mile radius do not believe that OUFC’s plans wholly or mostly meet 6 out of 7 of OCC’s stated priorities. Our view is the same.

For the all reasons stated above we do not believe that the priorities have been met sufficiently for the proposal to go forward. We also believe that the recent engagement exercise is a misleading guide to majority opinion in Oxfordshire. Within the 2-mile radius, Club supporters are very much a minority among respondents; in the County outside the radius they are very much a majority. This cannot truly reflect a real-life difference in the distribution of supporters across Oxfordshire. It simply shows that outside the radius supporters responded out of all proportion to their actual numbers.

I think the last sentence in particular is indicative of just how these people will try to twist things to suit their agenda. I would suggest the REAL reason for the disparity between supporters, inside and outside of the two mile radius, is in fact that FOSB, Middleton, Robey, and co have rallied a disproportionate number of NON supporters from within that area, not the other way round, as they're trying to suggest. Anyway, it's not enough, they lost.

It could almost have been drafted by Middleton himself..................

Thank God these people are no more than a sideshow now.
Click to expand...
Isnt FoSB stooge and KPC chair cllr Robey overstepping his position as KPC chair ? He has absolutely NO mandate to speak on behalf of Gosford and Water Eaton Parish , given he is unelected to that parish council

Also Cllr Robey appears to be challenging Oxford County council, who OWN the Triangle, the County Council clearly stated in their recent survey words to the effect of that no weighting will be given based on where respondents to the survey live. The was nothing regarding those who live 'within 2 miles' of The Triangle being given more of a 'say' . Cllr Robey is IMO unfit for the position he currently holds as KPC Chair- though a call for a vote of no confidence in his chairmanship, will fall on deaf ears at any KPC meeting which is dominated by FoSB infiltrators
 
Last edited:
unification said:
Got it, thanks, Billy. I remember reading it at the time.

Genuinely though, I want to see biodiversity improved at the site. It’s shitty to just pave over everything so to add planters, wildflowers, bay boxes etc to it isn’t just a good thing for nature but makes it appealing to humankind too.
Click to expand...
Absolutely I did ask the club when they were asking for feedback about having a memorial garden somewhere
 
This 2 mile radius nonsense is getting to me,where did this come from and why do and FoSB think it is exclusively for Kidlington residents

Two miles from The Kidlington Roundabout takes you to the Highwayman pub to the North BUT it takes you as far as the Dewdrop pub in the South a huge area of residents.

Yet all we hear is Robey ,Vicky and Middleton state that Kidlington residents are being hard done by and they will be the ones most affected

When you think about it the Prince of Wales Horspath Road is slightly nearer the Kassam than either of those two pubs mentioned.
What effect does match day traffic have on the people of Cowley ? None
Were they asked to comment before the Kassam was built? No

Hope OCC look at this sort of thing when making a decision
 
Sarge said:
Yarton's own Chester V - any misinformation he can find to boost his own self importance (to himself- albeit he seems to have the illusion of his intellectual superiority over everyone else)
Click to expand...
He's a Brummie isn't he....bound to be a bit of a dip stick really
 
MJB said:
No I have a feeling they said it wouldn’t.

It’s REALLY exciting though. Hints rather than details at times, but they’ve paving the way for a big bang of info and images on 9 October (assuming we get through 19 September - Cabinet emails in etc etc!)
Click to expand...
q & a's are being ' recorded' I believe?
 
Marked Ox said:
Just following the usual scare tactics approach. I'm surprised they didn't make it look even bigger.
Click to expand...
or higher - sad thing is some local residents WILL believe that that abortion of a design (open end / stand with no roof ffs) is the actual stadium design . Not an imagined one , intended to spread fear, created by FoSB. Another prime example of FoSB spreading malicious misinformation.
 
Orkney Islands Yellow said:
WTF?! Thankfully professional, detailed plans will be released on 9th October should the 19th September go our way.

View attachment 15466
Click to expand...
The images they are putting forward are nothing short of a shocking disgrace, a total fabrication and lie of how things will really look. They need taking to task as FOSB are absolute shisters, make my blood boil. 😡
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Northstandboy
  • Sticky
New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Planning
754 755 756
Replies
15K
Views
771K
Chrisox
C
brightonyellow
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - Stratfield Brake
304 305 306
Replies
6K
Views
415K
ljs
L
MarkG
What will happen to the Kassam stadium?
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Concretebob
C
OUSP
Call to Action Stadium Planning
Replies
4
Views
702
OUSP
OUSP
OUFCwaffle
Study: New stadium location of safe standing model.
Replies
14
Views
1K
ljs
L
Back
Top Bottom