Eaststanding
Well-known member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2020
- Messages
- 2,010
No one’s doubting your support of the club, or anyone else in SSU, but don’t forget there are equally committed, passionate and articulate fans throughout the ground. Using words such as ‘farce’ ‘insulting’ and ‘outrageous’ isn’t simply ‘voicing concerns’.Or, perhaps, someone who has followed the club for many years, including standing in the London Road, travelled up and down the country to attend games and spent a fair share on club merchandise. We also "donated" the offered refund for last season and still paid out £1150 for two 1893 club tickets for this season knowing full well that we were unlikely to see a game in person. (that price would have increased to include access to the bars and lounge)
I am not, nor have I, demanded that we be sat in our normal seats, yes, we would prefer but are prepared to sit elsewhere. However, simply voicing concerns at the wording of this announcement and pointing out how it could be possible for season ticket holders to be sat in, at the very least, their chosen stand, does not make me a "bit of a spoilt child".
Further, this notion that it is amusing to label all SSU support as "prawn sandwich" munching octogenarians who sit on their hands and never, ever raise their voices in support is just nonsensical. Anyone who has sat in the SSU can attest to that. It happens to be where a lot of folk who need to sit down during the game can still find space to attend games. It's where many intelligent conversations about the game take place, it's where guests of the club are seated, it's where many supporters who have followed the club for more years than some have been on this earth sit.
If that is what you meant by "with respect" thank you.
Whilst I admire your passion, what you’re asking just might not be reasonable in the circumstances, surely you can see that.