Manorlounger
Well-known member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 8,707
So that's ok then? We lose but are the better team. Not in my book. If you are the better team, you come away with a win.If he does say all that I'd agree with him.
So that's ok then? We lose but are the better team. Not in my book. If you are the better team, you come away with a win.If he does say all that I'd agree with him.
as much as I agree the formation shouldn't have been changed we didn't have the squad available to play the same formation. I actually think the formation worked today and other the first 90 seconds we handled everything Sunderland threw at us (which wasn't a lot they were abysmal for most of the game). We just lacked cutting edge, our build up play was decent and we bossed the game mainly. Just not creating the chances we did earlier in the season.Rad Ox complimenting our performance.
It’s appears we still have something about us. It’s not like one of those seasons under CW where it completely unravelled. But the corner has to be turned somewhere if we want to ensure our season ends with some degree of interest.
No, it's not OK to lose, and I'd much rather win but be the worse team on the day. I also agree with KR that this was frustrating. BUT in your initial point you didn't say that he'd come on and say he was glad we lost because we were the better team. The fact is that we played well, and, with a bit of luck, could have done what none of the last five teams have done--and scored against Sunderland.So that's ok then? We lose but are the better team. Not in my book. If you are the better team, you come away with a win.
Meh, really frustrating to lose that to a cheap goal so early in the game, against a team who looked average at best. We played well overall and I think we could play that game over four or five times and not lose it. Unfortunately, nothing is going our way lately. We either don’t turn up or we do and it doesn’t quite deliver. It’s frustrating in the extreme, but today was probably the sharpest and most positive we’ve looked for a little while.
The board sold both players who scored a few from distance which this teams is now lacking and replaced with a topped up piggy bank,
I still think too many loan players don't help one bit either as when chips are down they are not bothered as back to there parent club .
Players don't go out on loan to not be bothered otherwise they'd soon be sent packing like Dan Crowley with all due respect.The board sold both players who scored a few from distance which this teams is now lacking and replaced with a topped up piggy bank,
I still think too many loan players don't help one bit either as when chips are down they are not bothered as back to there parent club .
Once we got used to the new formation we were pretty good. We looked worse once Agyei went off and he was a bonus, as was the revived BranaganMeh, really frustrating to lose that to a cheap goal so early in the game, against a team who looked average at best. We played well overall and I think we could play that game over four or five times and not lose it. Unfortunately, nothing is going our way lately. We either don’t turn up or we do and it doesn’t quite deliver. It’s frustrating in the extreme, but today was probably the sharpest and most positive we’ve looked for a little while.
EDIT: Surprised that so many people seem to think we were actively bad today. Now I’m questioning everything!
Yup..get the razor blades out folksSome idiot on Radox
I wonder if @Mellowyellow will agree with this entirely different person?!Oh great, Paul is back on RadOx
You've lost me there. Are you criticising me for not saying something?No, it's not OK to lose, and I'd much rather win but be the worse team on the day. I also agree with KR that this was frustrating. BUT in your initial point you didn't say that he'd come on and say he was glad we lost because we were the better team. The fact is that we played well, and, with a bit of luck, could have done what none of the last five teams have done--and scored against Sunderland.