unification
Well-known member
- Joined
- 7 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 6,746
Yeap, ticks a lot of boxes.
And going back to @tonyw's post about replicating what Plymouth did in January last season - it reminds me of their signing of Saxon Earley (though different position) - he too had spent the first half of the season successfully on loan in L2.
You take some significant risk out - he's not playing his first senior football. He's proven he can mix it in the FL, and is ready for that next step (L1). They did the same with Finn Azaz in the summer (excellent season on loan at Newport in 21-22). Hell, we did the same with Beadle (although he was never a risk for anyone).
You never quite know how a PL former England U-17 kid will do when they come up against Guy Branston et al for the first time (if they even make it as far as the pitch), so why not cherry-pick those who've been shown to be comfortable already?
Attainable and with an impressive (albeit early days) record. You don't have to be the first to discover someone, you just have to be the first at our level and with the ability to offer the parent club greater development for their player (Beadle) or, if not in first team plans, a permanent transfer with a decent fee (Earley).
More of these please.
Absolutely terrific that 'baby eater' Guy Branston, a player who retired nine seasons ago, is still the go-to reference for a lower league kick-em-up-in-the-air defender. The youts on TikTok won't know who he is but those ITK still do.
I'm all for the approach of picking up a loanee performing well either at a team below us in League 1 or in League 2. As you say, the risk is diminished since the outlay will be lower than signing someone permanently, they're only here until the end of the season and if it doesn't go well, nothing is really lost in doing it (Tyler Smith shuffles uncomfortably in his seat).
I get the ambition on here and the keenness to spend the £400k on someone but invest it a little more carefully and consider the loan market and your returns are likely to be better. I'd take someone like Joe Taylor + a signing for the conveyor belt from Northern/Republic of Ireland than a £400k spend on a 29-year old on a big three year deal.
Many on here were getting into a frenzy over us spending £750k on Cole Stockton. I said it was a typical lower league purple patch and there would be no return on the £750k. After a late flurry of goals at the end of last season, he's signed for Burton and hardly played due to injury. I'm so glad we avoided that.
Maybe I'm just more risk adverse, mind.