Matches Crewe

Wallop

Well-known member
Joined
31 Jul 2018
Messages
2,253
Has KR actually said that Crewe should forfeit the three points as this article claims - I haven't seen that in print but I may have missed it. Touchline banter could be interesting on 17th November.
 

Dilla

Active member
Joined
26 Oct 2019
Messages
336
He implies it in his iFollow interview previewing the Peterborough match.
 

HampshireYellow

Well-known member
Joined
20 Dec 2017
Messages
2,794
What did Robinson say that was ‘despicable’? I hope someone has the balls to ask KR on record what he thinks about those comments. People saying that when we do finally play them it won’t be tasty or have extra spice - think again!
 

Marked Ox

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
16,693
Has KR actually said that Crewe should forfeit the three points as this article claims - I haven't seen that in print but I may have missed it. Touchline banter could be interesting on 17th November.

He said in the interview on RadOx on Tuesday night if Crewe have broken protocols then Oxford should get the 3 points. I guess Artell is slow on comprehension as it happened on Tuesday and this is what happens when Crewe go into silent mode again.

I also reckon Crewe are now genuinely concerned they might lose points.
 

Sarge

God like member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
30,563
Looks like Artell doesn't know when to shut up...we are now accused of "making a stink' well if there's anything to make a fuss about then it's a deadly pandemic!

maybe Artell was standing down wind of the sewage farm on Oct 3rd, and that's what he was referring to? :rolleyes: ;)
 

bazzer9461

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
13,905
So KR is at fault so @Malc as that t**t Artell gas now questioned the integrity of LR and OUFC will you now reveal what @Crewe conversed with you as it has come from Crewe Alexander that Tuesdays game was called of by KR and OUFC
 

Sarge

God like member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
30,563
He said in the interview on RadOx on Tuesday night if Crewe have broken protocols then Oxford should get the 3 points. I guess Artell is slow on comprehension as it happened on Tuesday and this is what happens when Crewe go into silent mode again.

I also reckon Crewe are now genuinely concerned they might lose points.
also reported in OM ( same interview Id assume?) .... if being the keyword
 

bazzer9461

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
13,905
He said in the interview on RadOx on Tuesday night if Crewe have broken protocols then Oxford should get the 3 points. I guess Artell is slow on comprehension as it happened on Tuesday and this is what happens when Crewe go into silent mode again.

I also reckon Crewe are now genuinely concerned they might lose points.
@Malc knows he spoke to @Crewe and knows the truth.
 

Wallop

Well-known member
Joined
31 Jul 2018
Messages
2,253
He said in the interview on RadOx on Tuesday night if Crewe have broken protocols then Oxford should get the 3 points. I guess Artell is slow on comprehension as it happened on Tuesday and this is what happens when Crewe go into silent mode again.

I also reckon Crewe are now genuinely concerned they might lose points.
Ah - so there is an important nuance in there in that the award of three points was conditional on whether 'Crewe had broken protocols' - if they have then I wholeheartedly support that position.

That is a very different statement to the one in the article - 'Oxford boss Karl Robinson said Crewe should forfeit the three points after the fixture was postponed for the second time in 10 days.'
 

captainox

Active member
Joined
7 Dec 2017
Messages
799
So 3 days after the incident, and after Crewe said they wouldn't make any further comment. Artell speaks out and either the write-up or his interview is all over the place.

It uses something that was said AFTER the second postponement and then leads into the Oxford kicking up a stink thing in relation to it being postponed which suggests the two are linked when obviously they can't be.

Robinson gave this interview after Tuesday's game had been postponed - https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/...-awarded-points-crewe-broken-rules-says-boss/ - and has said very little since. Him, Chris Williams and Niall McWilliams have all referred to confidentially whilst an EFL investigation is ongoing (on RadOx and ifollow interviews ahead of Peterborough)

"Apparently Karl Robinson has got all the answers and it's despicable what he's said," said the Crewe manager." - what is despicable? That he said points should be deducted if rules were broken? Isn't that a completely normal thing to suggest? Much like points deductions for fielding ineligible players/going into administration etc. Or is Artell referring to something else entirely but isn't actually saying what.

""There is a problem with testing and it leaves it open for people to manipulate the system. I take my hat off to Karl (Robinson) it was a clever thing to do." - come on Dave, you can't say something like that without backing it up or explaining what you mean.
 
Last edited:

bazzer9461

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
13,905
That interview is all over the place using something that was said AFTER the second postponement and then leading into the Oxford kicking up a stink thing in relation to it being postponed which suggests the two are linked when obviously they can't be.

"Apparently Karl Robinson has got all the answers and it's despicable what he's said," said the Crewe manager." - what is despicable? That he said points should be deducted if rules were broken?

""There is a problem with testing and it leaves it open for people to manipulate the system. I take my hat off to Karl (Robinson) it was a clever thing to do." - come on Dave, you can't say something like that without backing it up or explaining what you mean.

that’s all he appears to be doing
 

Similar threads


Top Bottom