Transfer News Summer 2023 Transfer Window Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unless we move the ball much quicker when building from the back, it wont make much difference who we have up front. We gave Cambridge time to re-group everytime we started to play from the back, no overlappng etc all has been mentioned, but just bringing in Marriott is not the answer.
Harris was totally isolated as I am sure Marriott would have been as well.
 
Although we obviously need another striker I'm not sure Marriott is the answer. It's not that I'd be unhappy with his experience and poaching ability, and initially I thought that's what we were lacking up front as well.

After watching the Cambridge game, I thought Harris had the potential to be a handful, his movement off the ball to get in behind is good and he's seriously quick. What good are those traits when we are playing a team with 10 men behind the ball and we're in a tough physical battle on a small pitch?

It was screaming out for someone to hold the ball up and bring in Rodrigues, Goodhram, Browne, Brannagan etc. I think we need a physical target man who the others can feed off, much like Ryan Taylor. Sometimes we would make 20 passes without making any progress, whilst Cambridge would stick it into their target man, pop it off and be attacking our back 4 in 2/3 passes. We need to be able to mix it up otherwise we become slow and predictable andf that's easy to defend against.

A couple of fullbacks who are willing to overlap to the byline would stop our wingers getting doubled up on. If I had the time I could screenshot so many occasions from that game where Browne held the ball on the wing, drew their full back miles out and left acres of space to exploit down the wing, only for Brown to sit behind him like a statue only wanting a back pass where it then ends up with our centre backs after that and they get back into shape. Will hold judgement to see if Stevens can do that on the right as Sam Long was equally scared of getting forward and seems a shadow of the marauding fullback we saw he was capable of once.
Completely agree. Have felt for most of the summer that a striker is not important until we have decided on our route to goal. If it is, as you say, with 5 or 6 players operating like quarter backs then a Marriott is going to get you nowhere. He is a fox in the box for a team that doesn't get in areas to put the ball in the box or shoot. If teams sit deep, Harris won't be much use either as he thrives on space behind - a bit like Vardy.

Case & point at the end as well. I've said enough on that subject now but that's exactly the problem and why Goodrham was invisible while Browne looked pretty ineffective. Rodrigues eventually realised if he came deep to pick the ball up, he could get in the game but that's exactly what Cambridge wanted him to do.

Manning was done by Bonner on Saturday. Tactically he was beaten up and they put a few areas of our team right under the microscope for all to see. Hopefully we'll look back and see it as them doing us a huge favour. Perhaps we won't get away with certain players 'doing a job' this season if we want to be competitive and bold decisions need to be made.
 
What hasn’t been mentioned on here is that we had 69% possession
Yes individual players made mistakes but what worried me was what we failed to do with our possession. It was far too slow apart from the first 15
Also even worse is that we looked liked rabbits in headlights when they came forward , both their fullbacks were prepared to overlap which says more about our wide players not pressing than anything else
There is a lot of work to be done here and anyone expecting automatic promotion think again
I have always felt this will be a rebuilding season
It’s not how much possession you have, it’s what you do with it.
 
Perhaps this is indicative of how hard it is to get a striker in League 1?

You've just shown an exaple of a league one club signing a striker, i can list many more, derby - connor Washington, barnesly - max watters, charlton - alfie may, bristol rovers - jevani brown, Cheltenham town - rob street, bolton - dan nlundulu, blackpool - kyle jospeh, burton - cole stockton, carlisle - luke plange and sean maguire! we signed mark harris but need another for competition, but this shows that there clearly are stirkers available.
 
Last edited:
No - reckon it's only £75k. A reduced amount for the Liverpool lad with more to follow. Not impressive is it from our millionaire owners?
 
No - reckon it's only £75k. A reduced amount for the Liverpool lad with more to follow. Not impressive is it from our millionaire owners?
Probably not a great time debate this having had our arses handed to us by a side with far less resource. But free transfers aren't entirely free. There are still fees of sorts to pay and inevitably decent wages being turfed out. We've attracted a good calibre of player so far from different areas of the pyramid. The loans won't be cheap, either.

The profile of the players is more important than what they cost. Look what we spent on Yanic - is he a better signing than Ruben Rodrigues? If you're getting the likes of Thorniley, Rodrigues and Harris without putting your hand in your pocket for a transfer fee, that's good business, not unambitious. They're also on long contracts.

Let's see what we do with the next few weeks. Not many free agents left now so now's the more likely time to spend. Saturday proved we may need more than we thought.
 
No - reckon it's only £75k. A reduced amount for the Liverpool lad with more to follow. Not impressive is it from our millionaire owners?
You can look at this in two ways (sensible, controlled and targeted spending vs. not being aggressive enough).

What really matters is whether we have signed good players or, not, and their performances on the pitch. Too soon to answer at the moment. That'll come in November time once the window has closed, and we can see the performances on the pitch.
 
No - reckon it's only £75k. A reduced amount for the Liverpool lad with more to follow. Not impressive is it from our millionaire owners?

- Brand new training ground with brand new pitches (which alone cost in excess of £1,000,000)
- Largest ever OUFC contract dished out to CB last summer
- Substantial compo paid to KR when they relieved him of his duties
- Large sums being paid to various 3rd parties and stakeholders for engagement and feasibility towards a new stadium (do you think Ridge & Partners or the stadium designers come cheap?)
- Extremely competitive playing budget this season (all of which is far from used, to date)

I'd say it's a reasonably impressive haul from the ownership group. Should we secure the additional targets required, we will all be happy with the spending levels of the owners, i expect.

We are far from the finished article as a club or first Xl but the evidence from the owners, is that they are really trying to push the club in the right direction. One bad defeat or perceived low expenditure on transfer fees (if we aren't counting signing on fees, agents fees etc etc) doesn't constitute the need to question the owners IMO. The evidence of the work they are putting in is there for all to see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom