oufcreport
Active member
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2022
- Messages
- 688
I still don't think it is necessarily, looks a bit younger. But will happily be wrong, just want to know who he isDefinitely ex-Sunderland left back Denver Hume.
Perhaps. It’s hard to tell. Will help a lot once he comes on and we know where he plays.I still don't think it is necessarily, looks a bit younger. But will happily be wrong, just want to know who he is
Absolutely matePerhaps. It’s hard to tell. Will help a lot once he comes on and we know where he plays.
more Max Dickov than Hume anyway.Max Dickov? Currently Brentford I believe, unless he hasn't signed new deal. Winger also
My adult response was that you’re complaining about something that was both wrong and possibly irrelevant.You assume we werent interested in?
Made up where he'd gone, no simply got clubs mixed up, 25 miles or so apart.
As a worry about our transfer business? Only in terms of a player I have personally seen play and play well, and believe he could have scored goals for us.
Its a game of opinions, why so early in the season, you the chinny bloke and one or two others get so aggressive about others opinions is beyond me.
Weird in a way. The new scotch egg maybe your aiming for and all that goes with it.
Rather childish, be adult and respond to an opinion, rather than your, "I'm in the know, so you must be wrong" diatribe.
It's a bold move to say the unknown trialist is definitely a certain player and then post a picture of said player who looks nothing like the trialist. I'm interested to see if it pays off.Definitely ex-Sunderland left back Denver Hume.
It's got to the point where I am comparing hair, smiles and chins
Was easier when they had TattoosIt's got to the point where I am comparing hair, smiles and chins