West Oxon U’s
Well-known member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 9,229
Our biggest match this century, even bigger than 2010.
COME ON YOU YELLOWS
It’s not a rivalry because there is no history. Rivalries grow after years of events good bad and ugly. That’s why Reading is a rivalry even though we haven’t played them for years. To me rivalry needs that edge, even an unsavoury edge, which just isn’t there with Wycombe. Pompey are more of a rivalry because of the history. Having said all that they might become rivals in the future. COYY
Take a shot every time they say something incorrect about either side. Going to be a long game.Oh look, Sky Sports has 'everything we need to know'.
I'm sure that will still be the case when the coverage starts at 7pm...
The stats don't tell the whole story, but the narrative on here is Mackie is completely useless and a waste of match time, etc as he contributes nothing to the team. The stats show that it's not the case and far from it, especially from a team wide perspective.My problem with the stats are that they draw conclusions based entirely on who starts a game, rather than looking at what happens when either player is on the pitch.
For example, Taylor could come onto the pitch in the 75th minute with us 3-0 down. He could score 4 goals in an inspiring fight back and that table would register it as proof that Mackie should start instead of Taylor. Or the opposite could happen. Taylor could leave the game in the 33rd minute with Oxford 1-0 up, Bristol Rovers could score 3 goals when Mackie is on the pitch, and the stats would show that we shouldn't be starting Taylor.
As I went way too deep into the numbers looking at this last week, I'll keep it at a very high level here (I would prefer to look forwards right now anyway). We score (approximately) every 70 minutes with Mackie on the pitch, and every 50 minutes without him. That is 0.5 goals difference per 90 minutes, which is a big difference.
I’m strangely more confident today than I have been all week
The stats don't tell the whole story, but the narrative on here is Mackie is completely useless and a waste of match time, etc as he contributes nothing to the team. The stats show that it's not the case and far from it, especially from a team wide perspective.
Of course, the missing part in the analysis is what other players scored more/less with Mackie or Taylor up top.
Or even 35 years ago, Live Aid was 1985 wasn't it?34 years ago today Freddy Mercury stepped out at Wembley in a yellow top with a full white kit underneath, won and wowed the crowd. Omen.
So, who's gonna make the headlines tomorrow and make sure I don't get a sheer heart attack?