No but it was down to Thatcher's Govt to provide incentive for business to choose to move or start up there and help the community to develop new opportunities. Provide educational/training opportunities so the miners and others have relevant skills for new jobs, provide start up capital/grants for new businesses, tax breaks to attract business in etc etc. And do you think it is acceptable to abandon people in swathes of the country because they are a bit militant and because they opposed the Govt*? Or is it the Govt's job to only help those who voted for it?
*Note this happened after they been abandoned by the Govt before the strike happened and whilst their whole world was being ripped apart. I'd be a tad militant then as well.
Even the Police agree they were wrong at Orgreave by the way, from the previous linked article:
In June 1991, South Yorkshire Police paid £425,000 in compensation to 39 miners for assault, wrongful arrest, unlawful detention and malicious prosecution.
In 2015, the Independent Police Complaints Commission reported that there was "evidence of excessive violence by police officers, a false narrative from police exaggerating violence by miners, perjury by officers giving evidence to prosecute the arrested men, and an apparent cover-up of that perjury by senior officers".[20] Alan Billings, the South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner, admitted that the police had been "dangerously close to being used as an instrument of state".
Do some more reading Bazzer and read up on the papers that were declassified from Thatcher's Govt about the Miner's strike.