Seems an awful lot of money to spend on a football club just to shut up one guy and achieve political aims. I think we need to find what the motives of the author are in making a non-story so public especially after sitting on it for so many years. And why the City of Oxford got so close to Wenda and why they felt the need to get involved in the first place, and then with a bribe of money for the carnival they switch stance.
The UN seem to reject the West Papau claims and there has been no noise about any goings on with the Indonesian government mistreating of people, at the moment it all seems a bit too convenient to be likely and more of a means of inconvenience to the football club, unless of course some credible, reliable and real facts are added to the story. But even then if some sort of proof was discovered there are lots of other football clubs with ownerships of dubious means or origin. Whether it is Newcastle or even Swindon's dodgy ownership, which should have had a points deduction penalty but seems to have gone very quiet, if we start taking bad words or guilty by association to the extreme no one would be allowed to own a football club.