- Joined
- 5 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 8,702
Last edited:
Sorry but Des has to take a large proportion of the blame. The way he sets up the team and the mentality of his approach just isn't good enough. It's utterly predictable and, in my opinion, verging on arrogant.Good! So he should be.
Good! So he should be.
Anderson is a way, way better right back than either Long or Stevens. And heβs so far ahead of both at right wing back they canβt even see him.If you want an average right back on similar wages to Murphy and Brannagan then yes
Sorry but Des has to take a large proportion of the blame. The way he sets up the team and the mentality of his approach just isn't good enough. It's utterly predictable and, in my opinion, verging on arrogant.
I really, really want it to work out for him. I wanted him to be appointed, but we've been so, so poor since he arrived. Hopefully this is his 5-1 loss to Cambridge moment, but I'm just not convinced he has the requisite ruthlessness to make the required changes.
Sorry for being right all along about Des. But nobody listened and itβs too late now.
Indeed part of the problem with Anderson was that none of our defenders could ever see himAnderson is a way, way better right back than either Long or Stevens. And heβs so far ahead of both at right wing back they canβt even see him.
Agreed. 90% of his passes are back to the player who just gave him the ball, and he has little positional awareness and no defensive covering ability. He does have the skill to go forward, but rarely uses it.Mcguane can go aswell overrated player
You may well be right JS2, but the cheap DESciples shot is unnecessary.Sorry for being right all along about Des. But nobody listened and itβs too late now. From second in the league into midtable obscurity and season over already. Truly a DESaster and how he ever got appointed will remain one of lifeβs mysteries.
I was at the game against Cheltenham - a struggle to beat a terrible team but many of the DESciples on here got a bit excited.