bazzer9461
God like member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 40,681
Just attempted to watch the extended highlights. What a shambles! The picture quality is very poor and the, so called, commentary is barely audible. The parts that are to be heard are laced with inane gibberish.Knowing ifollow they'll probably try and charge us for copyright infringement!
Most of the youngsters, probably don't know of him . In fact , Isaac Newton started the apple rollingProbably just as well he was correctly able to spell E=MC2, eh..?
Otherwise, we'd probably never have heard of him.
Reading the instructions for the camera on his phone by the looks of it!!Seen on Facebook, the "cameraman"
View attachment 11029
Very poor defending by our midfield. Bodin or Murphy were close enough to prevent the shot coming in, they were both ambling.
Which U’s player didn’t get out to Hamilton and slightly turned his back on the shot. It was wilful.
I've seen the clip a few times now and seen a lot of complaints about Easty, I still can't make up my mind. You just can't see if there was any fade on the shot which made it harder to stop. Only explanation, if it had gone straight it should have been kept out.
The parts that are to be heard are laced with inane gibberish.
The light levels were also appalling- the upgraded floodlights do not cut the mustardI've seen the clip a few times now and seen a lot of complaints about Easty, I still can't make up my mind. You just can't see if there was any fade on the shot which made it harder to stop. Only explanation, if it had gone straight it should have been kept out.
For me, Eastwood simply has to get there. I’m no goalkeeper but there’s a reason you see so few goals from that range even at the top level and plenty of players can hit them like that and obviously better. Unsighted, maybe, but it has travelled so far I just don’t think he’s read it and it’s a reactionary dive rather than one of anticipation. He maybe doesn’t believe it’s going to cause him any trouble until it’s too late.
...because all shots from 35 yards should be stopped easily...He has to save that after watching it a couple of times.
Bodin is the one who lets him shoot but it’s still 35 yards out.
...because all shots from 35 yards should be stopped easily...
... Or the ball faded to the right in its travel, but we would need someone in the terrace behind to confirm if it did or not as its not clear on the footage.Watching it through in slo-mo, Eastwood looks to slightly left of centre of his goal (angles are deceiving) and the ball has travelled through the group of players just outside the box before he starts to move. He does make the ground to the bottom right corner, so I can only conclude that he was unsighted (probably by Pritchard) or that ball was truly lashed home with some venom - if he's a step to his left, he saves it. If only Hamilton hadn't made such a pig's ear of his first attempt.....
How can you tell? That was my original point, the footage is unclear to say if the ball moved in the air or not.Bit of a difference in the quality of strike there.
A shot from 35 yards that isn't an absolute worldy like Roberto Carlos would leave any keeper disappointed if it goes in .How can you tell? That was my original point, the footage is unclear to say if the ball moved in the air or not.
A bloody disappointing goal to concede either way, but for me there is no clear blame on Easty for it.