Manager/Coach Des Buckingham

Brannagan has 7 goals and 6 assists this season from 27 games, Henry, Browne and Murphy have no goals, 1 assist and have probably played less minutes combined than him, they cost us more than him, I don't think Brannagan is the problem.
But you also shouldn't judge Brannagan purely on other failures. I don't think any other L1 club would have offered him the contract we did to keep him last season. I'm not even sure we would again. That's nothing to do with Brannagan, who continues to be magnificent, but if that comes at an inflated cost then it may not still be value for money.
 
But you also shouldn't judge Brannagan purely on other failures. I don't think any other L1 club would have offered him the contract we did to keep him last season. I'm not even sure we would again. That's nothing to do with Brannagan, who continues to be magnificent, but if that comes at an inflated cost then it may not still be value for money.

Robinsons situation caused the big pay packet so in one sense you are right, he is very expensive, but at least he does deliver against that, given his wage he would need to deliver stunning figures to be value for money. If the other expensive players delivered we would probably be challenging for the automatics and he would be a key figure in that and it wouldn't be such a bad deal, they are such flops that they drag the whole club down unfortunately. One assist and very little game time from numbers 2-4 in the wage structure is a bit of a disaster.
 
In 1968/69, Bayern used a grand total of 13 players across the 34 match season, winning the league by 8 points and wrapping it up with the double by winning the cup.

But could they have done it on a rainy Tuesday night against Tony Pulis lower mid table Stoke team?
 
If that's any where near true then we must be paying Murphy, Henry and Browne around £20K a week, we could get 5 good players who contribute regularly in for that, half the outfield team.
I was referring to CB contract.
 
Nobody has picked you up on this, so I will.

Our playing budget is 2nd in this division. We ARE NOT punching above our weight.

Our owners are putting a lot of money into the playing and non playing sides of the club. In my opinion, those people charged with managing it are not doing a good job with it (this is senior management, and not aimed at Des) so please stop this nonsensical "we're only little Oxford, and should be grateful to be here" rubbish.

I'm grateful that our owners are putting the money in, but very concerned at how it's being squandered.
Brilliant
 
This is just a theory and I have no facts to back this up, but back in the seventies and eighties ,most of our players would have played 35 plus games in a season ,remember also that there was only the one sub rule, plus there was a full combination programme for those who were injured to try and get back to match fitness. In fact when Liverpool won the European cup and league they used around 16 players all season in 60 plus games.
In our promotion years in the eighties I recall that most of the team played in every match.

Has the advent of more subs, no combination games added to the injury list because of damage mainly to hamstrings where our squad is concerned, or did the likes of Shotton Briggs Hamilton etc play on with injuries and just sucked it up.

But it does seem to me that many of the team who come on/ go off as substitutes seem to have most injuries.
Brannagan, Harris, Moore, Brown, Mc Guane Stevens have played in almost every match and are up to match fitness whereas the likes of Goodrham, Murphy, Mills, Browne, Bodin Edwards Neghru are perhaps not getting enough proper game time and consequently prone to more injuries.

Long and Leigh different sort of injuries and not hamstring related

Just a theory
How many players from days gone by are regretting playing through the pain barrier now.
Dave Langan being a prime example.
 
Des article in the Guardian:

“The chance to go home appealed. Buckingham whips out his phone and shows a picture of his ticket from his first-ever game, a 3-1 win for Oxford over Bristol City in 1990. He keeps the memorabilia as a connection to home and a way of remembering the grandmother who took him to the Manor Ground.“
 
No news as yet re the backroom set up and Chris Hacketts role, and whether there will be a confirmed Assistant Manager. I was expecting some news by today based on the interview the other night?
 
No news as yet re the backroom set up and Chris Hacketts role, and whether there will be a confirmed Assistant Manager. I was expecting some news by today based on the interview the other night?
Des said that would become a lot clearer by Saturday so I’d imagine it is spoken out before or after the game tomorrow in one of his interviews.
 
No news as yet re the backroom set up and Chris Hacketts role, and whether there will be a confirmed Assistant Manager. I was expecting some news by today based on the interview the other night?
Fool you once, shame on them. Fool you 100 times, shame on you?
 
No news as yet re the backroom set up and Chris Hacketts role, and whether there will be a confirmed Assistant Manager. I was expecting some news by today based on the interview the other night?
Something may happen but it won't be quick with Tim dithering around. If we had a director of football I suspect we'd have an assistant manager (not Hackett) and another role filled already.
 
I listened to the related pod, and they both said Oxford were playing way below the levels required for top 6. George did say that at the end of the month, things may look better, depending on signings, etc

Absolutely fair assessment.

With a full squad, we’d be up there. Without it - and we’re desperately short of players - we’re a mid-table side.

Plenty of time to get some of our injured players back and some new signings in.
 
Back
Top Bottom