The general makeup of already established FAB/CAB models is as below.
"The FAB will meet independently without club representation on a monthly basis. All meeting minutes will be made available to the wider fanbase once approved at the subsequent FAB meeting.
There are already several established FAB/CAB out there.......... this is what one does...........
"
Additionally, the FAB will meet with ***** Football Club executives on at least a quarterly basis, with guaranteed attendance of a representative from the ***** Board of Directors at all meetings. A public record outlining discussions at each meeting will be made available via Club and Fan Advisory Board channels. "
Under the Terms of Reference , the FAB operates independently and is consulted on:
- ***** strategic vision and objectives;
- Any proposals relating to ***** heritage;
- ******* plans for broader supporter engagement;
- Escalation, as agreed, of issues from organisations and supporter groups that engage in separate structured dialogue with the Club;
- ****** stadium relocation and the subsequent ****** Legacy Project;
- Finance and revenue generation; and
- Governance, regulation and compliance"
So much the same as you operate now, with OxVox holding a place in the meetings, and club representatives attending quarterly meetings, however the FAB/CAB noted above takes on issues that OxVox currently do independently (questioning governance etc)
But no, the existence of a club construct isn`t weakening the fans voice in any way or form..................... and you can`t see it.