Jon-ioualways
Well-known member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 1,001
Just changed my vpn to the UK, and have been suitably depressed, all over again. Sigh.
My theory is that every coach has to do the same UEFA coaching badges, and follow the same coaching "rule book".
and that Buckingham follows it to a tee.
So keeping possession is better than not.
Leads to passing the ball from the back, or if under pressure, then back to the goalkeeper.
So we don't see GKs booting the ball up the pitch anymore.
We also see our attacks petering out and the ball goes all the way back to Cummings.
I think the players don't believe in this, but have to follow the tactics.
We also see all of our players back in the box or thereabouts to defend a free kick or corner, leaving nobody up front if we do clear the ball. Leads to the ball coming straight back at us again.
I haven't watched the highlights, but felt Orient were unlucky not to get a penalty in the first half. Maybe someone else could explain why as it looked a blatant foul in the box by us.
One of the awful things which the RadOx team called the earthquake was on 90 minutes when three Orient players went down injured all at the same time with nobody near them. Stevenage tactics to a tee. Is there some new rule that players have to leave the pitch for at least 30 seconds after treatment. And why didn't the ref book them for simulation?
You are absolutely right who knows. But there is always a but. We have moved from a team with a plan that in the most worked to a team with a plan that in the most fails. Des says his plan is to get the ball to his preferred formation of 2 wingers, but to do that he has lost the midfield battle and the weaknesses in formation have lead to kamikaze defending. We are now usually overrun in midfield, 3 against 4 or 5.Of course there is no way of proving that one way or the other, which also makes your statement codswallop. One day we will be able to jump to other worlds in the multiverse and settle these kinds of arguments for good.
Interestingly those possession stats at half time were more like Oxford 40% Orient 60%. The jump in our possession stats came when we went 2-1 down and Orient game plan became hold what we have.On the point of possession. This what the BBC match stats say for the Orient game,
Oxford 49%, Orient 51%. It seemed pretty even to me watching from the North Stand.
So either the possession based tactic doesn’t work, or at least doesn’t give you any possession % advantage over the opposition. Or both teams are applying the same tactic and cancelling each other out?