Please can you expand on the pension point?Public servants have far worse pay than those in comparable positions in the private sector, and the pensions really are nothing special. These are facts, not opinions.
Please can you expand on the pension point?Public servants have far worse pay than those in comparable positions in the private sector, and the pensions really are nothing special. These are facts, not opinions.
Please can you expand on the pension point?
Please can you expand on the pension point?
I don’t think anecdotal evidence should be presented as fact, and I don’t think the lack of final salary makes defined benefit equal or inferior to defined contribution.I've not heard of anyone being given a final salary pension in the last 15 years - I suppose they might still exist but I've not seen it.
I don’t think anecdotal evidence should be presented as fact, and I don’t think the lack of final salary makes defined benefit equal or inferior to defined contribution.
Most people would recognise public sector pensions as superior (https://www.which.co.uk/money/pensi...service-pension-scheme-explained-a2xZV8g94vVR describes the civil service pension as “one of the most generous of its kind”) and that’s certainly been my anecdotal experience with a partner who has started work in multiple Public Sector organisations in the past 15 years.
As long as you're not involved it probably would.To be fair I think this place could probably do a better job of running the country than any politically constrained government.
We all, more or less, agree on the basics.
Nationalised infra for the people it serves and proper PR.
Per Wikipedia, anecdotal evidence is evidence based only on personal observation, collected in a casual or non-systematic manner. Personal experience is anecdotal evidence.It's wrong to assume the example scheme you've given is available to most public servants. It's not.
It's not anecdotal evidence on my part, it's personal experience.
Per Wikipedia, anecdotal evidence is evidence based only on personal observation, collected in a casual or non-systematic manner. Personal experience is anecdotal evidence.
Lucky thing!Well I'm on a final salary pension. But then I worked in the Netherlands for 35 years.
Ha, good question..Lucky thing!
On a serious note, what was your employer contribution?
Why is it arrogant to suggest people don't think through the full consequences of actions?
Come again? How does this link to my point?That depends on which side of the consequence your are.
For example, I don’t have the benefit of an attractive employer contributory pension scheme and so have to make my own way using investments methods that may/will seem offensive to you.
No one else is going to fund my retirement.
Come again? How does this link to my point?
If you are saying 'don't privatise, think of people without pensions' then absolutely no investment portfolio in lieu of a pension should have more than 0.5% invested in a single company. I'd go further and say no more than 2% in a particular service category (eg water companies). Yes invest, but any portfolio has to be able take the crunchy with the smooth. Spreading risk is the name of the game. Isn't it?
My dad is a far left union bully, he used to love it when the stock market went down "all the rich bastards lose their money".I guess I was referring to your comment about your colleagues. Naked Greed, I think you called it.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I am simply saying that we are all caught up in this web of trying to make money to support our futures. That involves investing in companies that make profits and pay dividends or property portfolios that charge rent, all of which you seem to find abhorrent, if I am to understand you correctly.
You've totally misunderstood me. I have a couple of stocks and shares ISAS so have skin in the game. I just appreciate it's not all sunshine and roses and I try my best to avoid sectors that simply exploit. It's not an exact science but I did my homework before I invested.I guess I was referring to your comment about your colleagues. Naked Greed, I think you called it.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I am simply saying that we are all caught up in this web of trying to make money to support our futures. That involves investing in companies that make profits and pay dividends or property portfolios that charge rent, all of which you seem to find abhorrent, if I am to understand you correctly.
Bearing in mind that no one thought our attack was good enough last year, and that we likely will have Browne, Murphy, Wildschut, Bodin, Henry and Baldock all on the books this year, I have no idea why people want Joseph back.
No idea what happened here!!It is indeed a cost of living crisis .