IsleofWightYellow
Well-known member
- Joined
- 20 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 8,645
No to censorship. The thread can always be closed with the little X in the corner of your browser
I refer you back to my previous answers and when you find yourself back here, start again.
And what about the rehabilitation of offenders act? We kept obika on for a year longer than was criminally logical
I can hear it now: "We were in for Evans, but the board decided that due to the supporters' feelings on the matter we have ended our interest. We will now start looking elsewhere and we expect to have some further news within 48 hours. Or a week. Well, before the season anyway, unless we have to wait until the end of the transfer window..."
Can't be Henry Landers he is playing with a bunch of trialists tomorrow, when the Maidenhead 1st team are playing in the afternoon against BracknellHenry Landers obvs.
You are guessing what happened, because you clearly think he is guilty despite being found not guilty - but not once have you said what evidence you are basing this on, apart from several factually incorrect claims.
None of us know truly know what happened on that night, all we can look at is the evidence that we’ve seen, and the fact that the latest jury, given all the evidence, found him not guilty.
Also, saying your moral compass is different to mine (read: better) smacks of pompousness to be honest. Can you elaborate and specify how, and why we are different? Or will you just reply on trite soundbites as you have all thread? I think what he did was morally wrong, because he had a partner. I also find creeping into a hotel room to sleep with some girl your friend pulled while your mates try and film it from the window grotty and disgusting. But I don’t think a crime was committed - and the law of the land agrees with me. You don’t, but can’t articulate why.
This started with someone asking whether fans wanted Evans to sign. I responded to say no thanks and then a few people, who nearly always want to force their opinion on others on this forum, decided to pile in, starting with your mate from Didcot."I’m glad it got the reaction I had hoped" ???? That does not make any sense at all. The guy is a good contributor to the forum, and you simply want to goad him it seems, crazy.
If you're a tub thumping anti Ched Evans person, then why not act adult and provide an alternative view, rather than sounding like you have conquered Everest, with, "I'm glad it got the reaction it did."
I think a padded cell and the NHS forum, rather than this forum is more appropriate for you.
We're all Oxford fans with different views, why try to respond as a pig hill fan might.
We are one of a lot of clubs in for him. There is a very high probability we will be outbid.
Anyone got a record of the longest player thread who isn't an oufc player?
Pretty sure there isn’t a single OUFC player referenced on 144 pages of the “summer signings” thread...
What about married OUFC players, though?Pretty sure there isn’t a single OUFC player referenced on 144 pages of the “summer signings” thread...
Commendable pedantry Sir!
We need to get real. He is an innocent man as far as the law is concerned. We should be making decisions on football skill and would he be an asset to the club.
This started with someone asking whether fans wanted Evans to sign. I responded to say no thanks and then a few people, who nearly always want to force their opinion on others on this forum, decided to pile in, starting with your mate from Didcot.
If you actually took the time to read the posts you will see I’ve sent several stating why I have the opinion I have. You may not agree, but I’m not looking for your approval. In fact I don’t give a damn what your view is on almost anything you say based on most of your posts I’ve read.
Everyone on this forum has the right to express their own opinion. Not just a select few like you for instance. If they choose to do it in response to someone else’s earlier post, don’t be too surprised if they get the same back in equal measure.