- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 13,814
Well that answers that then, the full price is still a large saving and good value.Yes, the remaining home games would cost £440 if you paid £22 a ticket. £400 if you paid the discounted membership rate.
Well that answers that then, the full price is still a large saving and good value.Yes, the remaining home games would cost £440 if you paid £22 a ticket. £400 if you paid the discounted membership rate.
I would have had more sympathy had it not been stated that they would now not attend any more matches because of their treatment! Get a grip!! Stop sulking and either take a hit on the games paid for or pay for up coming games - but to not go to any more games is frankly pathetic.
Yes, the remaining home games would cost £440 if you paid £22 a ticket. £400 if you paid the discounted membership rate.
I would have had more sympathy had it not been stated that they would now not attend any more matches because of their treatment! Get a grip!! Stop sulking and either take a hit on the games paid for or pay for up coming games - but to not go to any more games is frankly pathetic.
I managed to lose my season ticket card after the Fleetwood game. So the Saturday of the Burton game, I rang the ticket office at about 1pm, they printed a match day ticket for my seat and put it aside in reception, free of charge.
Today I still haven't found it, so called ticket office, they are printing a new one, sending it to me by post, also free of charge.
So thank you ticket office and OUFC, it's not all bad news.
I think the point is more about being expected to essentially pay again for games which they have already attended and paid full price for.
In the past I’ve had season tickets and had to miss games and have done so already this season and of course I am not requesting a refund.
Regardless of whether you consider it to be a bit stroppy or pathetic (as someone else so eloquently put it) is irrelevant.
The club should, in my opinion use some discretion and offer the reduction as a gesture of goodwill due to the fact that the games have already been attended.
Of course I don’t expect everyone to agree, but it isn’t unreasonable for someone to not want to use a company who has provided what they consider a poor service.
This seasons average attendance for opening three games is 6154
Last season it was 6802 (2nd to 4th games exc Portsmouth as it’s a bit of an anomaly)
With this in mind I’d have thought the club would be keen to ensure as many people come to games as often as possible.
Of course I don’t expect everyone to agree, but it isn’t unreasonable for someone to not want to use a company who has provided what they consider a poor service.
We are not taking about a company, but a football club and support shouldn't depend on service. We have a crappy 3 sided stadium with average food and warm crappy beer. It is cold all year round with toilets I wouldn't let me dog use. We have put up with some awful games from some awful players. We have all had a pretty poor service over the last decade or 2 - but we still come back because it's Oxford United. If that isn't enough for 'your friend' then that's their problem.