Yes, addressing the points in your post is definitely a "random reply".A rather random reply to my post but hey ho.
At the time of the IL reign I was in your group, maybe not the inner circle but was fed the info to put on the forum to get your message across, so I was fully aware of that groups veiws first hand. I know how this works and you can actually make a difference if you put your efforts into a group such as Oxvox, I don’t believe that will happen because you would then not be able to post the stuff you want to.
As for the warnings about DE and Tiger, from the outside it looked like bitterness for the people you support not getting the club.
So, you're associating me with a group which was supposedly anti-IL? Well, that's news to me! By this "group" I assume you mean Sennett and Methven? One of whom was accused of being too close to the Lenegans whilst chair of OxVox, and the other acted as an advisor to the Lenegans. Clearly, they were rabidly anti-IL! And, for the record, I don't think I even met Sennett until around 2008-9, so how I was meant to be a part of this group, Lord knows!
You do hit on an interesting point though about not being able to post the stuff I want though. It's fairly apparent that in the not-too-distant-past, OxVox sacrificed a certain degree of its openness and independence to ensure a "relationship" with the club. For example, the Q&A with DE in July '17 was published with claims from DE which committee members knew to be false, but they were allowed to go unchallenged. We than have the total radio silence over the ST bid and takeover, despite the obvious (for those who cared to look) concerns over his potential stewardship.
There clearly is a balance which needs to be struck when trying to work in partnership with the club, but the question has to be asked: what's the point in having a relationship if the quid pro quo is that you can't challenge false claims, you can't pass on information to the members you are supposed to represent, and you effectively become a part of the club's PR machine. Recent events suggest that the current committee have taken a big step in the right direction with an apparently more robust approach being taken. I do wonder at what point they will stop waiting for answers to questions and start some form of protest over the way the club is run and how fans are being treated. There clearly has to be a threshold somewhere, and I'd be interested to learn where they think that lies.