Witney Yellow
Active member
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 111
Will I get more abuse???I double dare you to wear a Chester V mask while refereeing
Will I get more abuse???I double dare you to wear a Chester V mask while refereeing
Only if you claim to be neutral but clearly help one side to winWill I get more abuse???
agreed, but doesnt Chester V claim to be neutral
Just waiting for the Oxford English Dictionary to confirm my definition has been accepted, but should go through without question.Be careful not to get neutral confused with cautiously neutral.
Cautiously Neutral (adjective)
A term often employed within the realm of political discourse, particularly by individuals holding minor governmental positions or advisory roles, to ostensibly convey a stance of impartiality or neutrality, despite actions and behaviours suggesting otherwise. Such individuals may utilise this phrase strategically to obscure their true biases or affiliations, thereby maintaining a facade of objectivity while advancing personal or partisan agendas. The term 'cautiously neutral' implies a deliberate and calculated approach to appearing unbiased, often characterised by careful selection of words or actions to avoid explicit association to a particular group or faction.
Good idea I have to spaces on my drive only rule I have is no pissing in my garden you can do it in my neighbours on the way to the Triangle.If only these residents seeking to rent out their driveways would get on the portal and support the proposals we'd be home and hosed already. Sort it out Kidlington-based profiteers...
I'm refereeing a football match in Yarnton tonight. Wish me luck!
edit - game now off - waterlogged pitch
nor for that matter the grounds they should be objecting on - which should equate to 'objections ' of that kind being discounted. .. Although with it being CDC, there's no certainty - Keep encouraging friends acquaintances and family members to send in supportive comments, the more the merrier.I think we can be sure that a significant percentage of those whom object will not have read the planning application at all. They’ll either listen to the frothing zealots of north Oxford, or they’ll simply have enough existing bigotry towards football fans and misinformation from the Oxford Mail to not be motivated to educate themselves of the benefits, or not, of the actual application.
none of them have not even middletonI think we can be sure that a significant percentage of those whom object will not have read the planning application at all. They’ll either listen to the frothing zealots of north Oxford, or they’ll simply have enough existing bigotry towards football fans and misinformation from the Oxford Mail to not be motivated to educate themselves of the benefits, or not, of the actual application.
kidlington residents your all going to be trapped in your homes View attachment 18811
imagine what the parking would be likeBe good practice in case FOSB, OCC, CC, the Lib Dem and Green alliance of doom and the various nimbys kill the our club and we have to restart at Yarnton Lane, that place is going to be a nightmare when we have 10,000 there, they will regret not giving the triangle site in OX2 which would of kept us out of Kidlington.
imagine what the parking would be like
Remember, CDC don't actually decide on the planning application; the planning officer (a trained professional employed by the council) makes a recommendation to approve or refuse the submission (based chiefly on compliance with policy).nor for that matter the grounds they should be objecting on - which should equate to 'objections ' of that kind being discounted. .. Although with it being CDC, there's no certainty
Have you considered asking FoSB to help? They have a great track record of upkeeping sporting facilities after allBoooo. Game off. Waterlogged pitch!