Some of there members have already commented I recognise some of the names. massive push now from oufc supporters in Kidlington could counter itFoSB are going to tell their 'supporters' what to say.
At that stage, there could be a big increase in the number against
We need to push for many more in favour (presumably Oxvox will help push this?)
Or a big push after, to balance the for/against split post FoSBSome of there members have already commented I recognise some of the names. massive push now from oufc supporters in Kidlington could counter it
How many times FoSB. It's a separate planning application.3. Footbridge
There isn’t one! The application completely disregards the promises made by the likes of Tim Williams (Oxford United's CEO) not so long ago. This is an integral part of the offer sold to the local community and must form part of this planning application.
which also goes with occ responce in the planningLooks that way
I also like the email from CDC about traffic modeling
Fosb are moaning about it but then read this bit View attachment 18547
Complete and utter drivel the lot of it.
More rubbish members email
Everything is addressed in the planning; the issue is that it's not being read. They have also neglected to read the email response from the CDC, which clearly states that while traffic modeling would be preferred, its absence will not halt the application.Complete and utter drivel the lot of it.
Said it many times, the time for conjecture is over. If FoSB cannot be bothered to read the planning application they should just be quiet and stop making up stories. It's not helpful to anyone.Everything is addressed in the planning; the issue is that it's not being read. They have also neglected to read the email response from the CDC, which clearly states that while traffic modeling would be preferred, its absence will not halt the application.
Someone does….please keep upWho travels across the city to watch strangers urinate anyway?!
But even that headline is a half truth, which you can see by zooming in and reading the text... "Grant Ferguson revealed a figure of £130 million to £150 million"Well he did post a copy of an Oxford Mail front page to me to try and counter the negativity they print.View attachment 18549
My complaint was I feel justified and with him posting that in his email reply to me if I remeber correctly there was a bit of a commotion from the antis and how are we going to afford thatBut even that headline is a half truth, which you can see by zooming in and reading the text... "Grant Ferguson revealed a figure of £130 million to £150 million"
So 1 headline in support as such to 10 againstMy complaint was I feel justified and with him posting that in his email reply to me if I remeber correctly there was a bit of a commotion from the antis and how are we going to afford that
Unbias my a**e.Well he did post a copy of an Oxford Mail front page to me to try and counter the negativity they print.View attachment 18549
Rather than get angry over this I actually find it hilarious.And yet another one who believes everything fosb say lies lies and more lies View attachment 18539
Yeah, that's...not a positive story.Well he did post a copy of an Oxford Mail front page to me to try and counter the negativity they print.View attachment 18549