That did escalate quickly! Just to confirm my stance on a few things....
No I don't want to reverse Brexit at all. I was just pointing out that it would be the best way to increase the UK economic performance. I totally agree that another referendum cant be held for a long time and it would need another referendum to rejoin (if we wanted to and if they wanted us).
The Times article made me laugh as it was so obviously designed to wind people up but for the avoidance of doubt I dont think people who voted for Brexit are thick and I do believe in universal suffrage.
On Rachel Reeves and normal background. She went to a normal comprehensive school (like me) and doesn't have a huge amount of family wealth to fall back on and doesn't have a sense of entitlement (probably like all of us). Yes, she hasn't run a business but most people havent. I also dont think that qualifies you to be Chancellor just like being a doctor or nurse doesnt qualify you to be SoS for Health.
The economic performance (good or otherwise) is never down to one thing - which is why it is often wrong to compare economies without controlling the variables. The biggest impact on the UK economy is undoubtedly Covid. Brexit has had a negative impact though - we export less in terms of volumes and what we do export is now more expensive. We also have a skills shortage (which may help rise wages but also contributes to inflation).
@PottersRightBoot - the laffer curve is completely discredited and all the evidence suggests it isnt true (I'm on home turf here). Where it has been used Reagan in the 1980s is a good example, it has been a disaster. The Congressional Library has some great papers on this which I will try and dig up (although granted it's not everyone's way of having a fun time).
@holdsteady - definitely save your quid. I would absolutely bomb in a campaign. Not populist/popular enough and my more tax ideas would go down like a lead balloon.